VIJ Digital library
Articles

Customers Adaptation of E-banking services; extending TAM through Anthpmorphism in Saudi Arabia

Kholoud Alqutub
Taif University

Published 2023-10-23

Keywords

  • Perceived anthropomorphism (PA), Perceived ease of use (PEOU), Perceived usefulness (PU), Privacy concerns (PC), Attitude, and Intention to adopt AI banking services.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate influence of perceived anthropomorphism, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, privacy concerns, as well as attitude on intention to adopt AI banking services. The research follows a positivistic and deductive reasoning approach, utilizing experimental techniques in a cross-sectional design. Data of 210 responses collected through a questionnaire distributed via Google Docs were analyzed using Smart PLS3. The results indicate that intention to adopt AI banking services is influenced by perceived anthropomorphism, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and privacy concerns through attitude. Strong correlations among all variables were observed, highlighting the significant and positive impact of artificial intelligence on encouraging acceptance of advanced technology in banking sector in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Future research is recommended to test various other variables using the same research model in different countries. Practical implications include the need for senior managers and policymakers in financial institutions to formulate relevant policies and marketing strategies aligned with customer needs. This research study's primary objective is to prospect and examine factors impelling consumer adoption intentions of artificial intelligence in banking sector in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

References

  1. Agarwal, P., Swami, S., & Malhotra, S. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence adoption in the post COVID-19 new-normal and role of smart technologies in transforming business: a review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.
  2. Airenti, G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 117-127.
  3. Alsyouf, A.; Masa’Deh, R.; Albugami, M.; Al-Bsheish, M.; Lutfi, A.; Alsubahi, N. Risk of Fear and Anxiety in Utilising Health App Surveillance Due to COVID-19: Gender Differences Analysis. Risks 2021, 9, 179.
  4. Amin, H.; Rahman, A.R.A.; Razak, D.A. Consumer acceptance of Islamic home financing. Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal. 2014, 7, 307–332.
  5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. and Thompson, R. (1995), “The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration, technology studies”, Special Issue on Research Methodology, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 285-309.
  6. Biswas, A.; Bhattacharjee, U.; Chakrabarti, A.K.; Tewari, D.N.; Banu, H.; Dutta, S. Emergence of Novel Coronavirus and COVID-19: Whether to stay or die out? Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 182–193.
  7. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human–computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(6), 553-574
  8. Butt, A.H., Ahmad, H., Goraya, M.A.S., Akram, M.S. and Shafique, M.N. (2021), “Let’s play: me and my AI-powered avatar as one team”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 1014-1025, doi: 10.1002/ mar.21487
  9. Castelo, N., Bos, M.W. and Lehmann, D.R. (2019), “Task-dependent algorithm aversion”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 56 No. 5, pp. 809-825, doi: 10.1177/0022243719851788.
  10. Chou, S. Y., Lin, C. W., Chen, Y. C., & Chiou, J. S. (2023). The complementary effects of bank intangible value binding in customer robo-advisory adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
  11. Consultants, M. Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in the Banking Sector; Millinium Consultants: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2022; Available online: https://www.millenniumci.com/benefits-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-banking-sector (accessed on 11 September 2022).
  12. Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
  13. technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, p. 319
  14. Davis, F.D. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1985. 88.
  15. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340
  16. Davis, R., & Wong, D. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring the optimal experience of the eLearning environment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 97-126.
  17. Dietvorst, B.J., Simmons, J.P. and Massey, C. (2015), “Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 144 No. 1, pp. 114-126, doi: 10.1037/xge0000033.
  18. Dinh, C. M., & Park, S. (2023). How to Increase Consumer Intention to Use Chatbots? An Empirical Analysis of Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations on Social Presence and the Moderating Effects of Fear across Generations. Electronic Commerce Research. H. Alboqami DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2023.134014 210
  19. Hair, J.F. Jr, Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C. and Sarstedt, M. (2016), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  20. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011), “PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, pp. 139-152.
  21. Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., & Schaefer, K. E. (2011). Can you trust your robot? Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 19(3), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480461 1415045
  22. Hua, X., Huang, Y., 2021. Understanding China’s fintech sector: development, impacts and risks. Eur. J. Financ. 27 (4–5), 321–333.
  23. Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172
  24. Iancu, I., & Iancu, B. (2022). Interacting with Chatbots Later in Life: A Technology Acceptance Perspective in COVID-19 Pandemic Situation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 1111003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1111003
  25. Kaakeh, A.; Hassan, M.K.; Almazor, S.F.V.H. Factors affecting customers’ attitude towards Islamic banking in UAE. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2019, 14, 668–688.
  26. Kannan, V.R. and Tan, K.C. (2005), “Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance”, Omega, Vol. 33, pp.
  27. Kaushik, A.K., Agrawal, A.K. and Rahman, Z. (2015), “Tourist behaviour towards self-service hotel
  28. technology adoption: trust and subjective norm as key antecedents”, Tourism Management
  29. Perspectives, Vol. 16, pp. 278-289
  30. Kim, H. Y., & McGill, A. L. (2018). Minions for the rich? Financial status changes how consumers see products with anthropomorphic features. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 429-450.
  31. Kim, H., Kim, T. and Shin, S.W. (2009), “Modeling roles of subjective norms and eTrust in customers’
  32. acceptance of airline B2C eCommerce websites”, Tourism Management, Vol. 30 No. 2,
  33. pp. 266-277
  34. Kim, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94-107.
  35. Lok, C.K. Adoption of smart card-based e-payment system for retailing in Hong Kong using an extended technology acceptance model. In E-Services Adoption: Processes by Firms in Developing Nations; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2015; Volume 23B, pp. 255–466.
  36. Lombardi, R., Paoloni, P., Belyaeva, Z., & Shams, S. R. (2020). Guest editorial: Smart technologies for sustainable business model: Adaptation challenges and prospects in economic and cultural drift. Management Decision, 58(8), 1517-1524
  37. Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A. and Morewedge, C.K. (2019), “Resistance to medical artificial intelligence”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 629-650, doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucz013.
  38. Lu, L., Cai, R., & Gursoy, D. (2019). Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 36-51.
  39. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032
  40. Maskeliunas, R.; Damaševiˇcius, R.; Segal, S. A review of internet of things technologies for ambient assisted living environments. ¯ Futur. Internet 2019, 11, 259
  41. Mokmin, N. A. M., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2021). The Evaluation of Chatbot as a Tool for Health Literacy Education among Undergraduate Students. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6033-6049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10542-y
  42. Moussawi, S., &Koufaris, M. (2019). Perceived Intelligence and Perceived Anthropomorphism of Personal Intelligent Agents: Scale Development and Validation.
  43. Mustak, M., Salminen, J., Ple, L. and Wirtz, J. (2021), “Artificial intelligence in marketing: topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 124, pp. 389-404, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.044.
  44. Northey, G., Hunter, V., Mulcahy, R., Choong, K., & Mehmet, M. (2022). Man vs machine: how artificial intelligence in banking influences consumer belief in financial advice. International Journal of Bank Marketing, (ahead-of-print).
  45. Oh, H., Jeong, M. and Baloglu, S. (2013), “Tourists’ adoption of self-service technologies at resort hotels”,
  46. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66 No. 6, pp. 692-699
  47. Park, B., Chang, H., & Park, S. S. (2019). Adoption of digital devices for children education: Korean case. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 247-256.
  48. Park, S. S., Tung, C. D., & Lee, H. (2021). The adoption of AI service robots: A comparison between credence and experience service settings. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), 691-703.
  49. Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020). Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(10), 3199-3226.
  50. Ragheb, M. A., Tantawi, P., Farouk, N., & Hatata, A. (2022). Investigating the Acceptance of Applying Chat-Bot (Artificial Intelligence) Technology among Higher Education Students in Egypt. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 8, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJHEM/V08N02/ART-1
  51. Rahman, M.; Ming, T.H.; Baigh, T.A.; Sarker, M. Adoption of artificial intelligence in banking services: An empirical analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2022; ahead-of-print.
  52. Rasheed, H. M. W., Chen, Y., Khizar, H. M. U., & Safeer, A. A. (2023). Understanding the factors affecting AI services adoption in hospitality: The role of behavioral reasons and emotional intelligence. Heliyon.
  53. Ren, X. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Depression: How AI Powered Chatbots in Virtual Reality Games May Reduce Anxiety and Depression Levels. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice, 3, 48-58. (In Chinese)
  54. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.M. (2015), SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt.
  55. Rosman, C. (2018). Mad about Erica: Why a million people use bank of America9s chatbot. American Banker, New York, NY. www. americanbanker. com/news/mad-about-erica-why-amillion-peopleuse-bank-of-americas-chatbot
  56. Ross, S. What percentage of the global economy is comprised of the financial services sector. Investopedia 2015, 5, 2015. Available online: https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/030515/what-percentage-global-economy-comprised-financial-servicessector.asp (accessed on 11 September 2022).
  57. Safari, K.; Bisimwa, A.; Armel, M.B. Attitudes and intentions toward internet banking in an under developed financial sector. PSU Res. Rev. 2020, 6, 39–58.
  58. Stock, R. M., & Merkle, M. (2017, March). A service robot acceptance model: User acceptance of humanoid robots during service encounters. In 2017 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom Workshops) (pp. 339-344). IEEE.
  59. Suhartanto, D.; Dean, D.; Ismail, T.A.T.; Sundari, R. Mobile banking adoption in Islamic banks: Integrating TAM model and religiosity-intention model. J. Islam. Mark. 2020, 11, 1405–1418.
  60. Thaker, M.A.B.M.T.; Pitchay, A.B.A.; Thaker, H.B.M.T.; Amin, M.F.B. Factors influencing consumers’ adoption of Islamic mobile banking services in Malaysia: An approach of partial least squares (PLS). J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 1037–1056.
  61. Van Dyke, T., Midha, V., & Nemati, H. (2007). The effect of consumer privacy empowerment on trust and privacy concerns in e‐ commerce. Electronic Markets, 17(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10196780601136997
  62. Van Slyke, C., Shim, J. T., Johnson, R., & Jiang, J. (2006). Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(6), 415–444. https://doi.org/10. 17705/1jais.00092
  63. Van Slyke, C., Shim, J. T., Johnson, R., & Jiang, J. (2006). Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(6), 415–444. https://doi.org/10. 17705/1jais.00092
  64. Venkatesh, V., Hoehle, H., Aloysius, J.A., Nikkhah, H.R., 2021. Being at the cutting edge of online shopping: Role of recommendations and discounts on privacy perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 121, 106785.
  65. Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G.R. and Pallister, J.G. (2007), “Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 1”, Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 251-280, doi: 10.1108/ 17465660710834453.
  66. Yu, X., Xu, S. and Ashton, M. (2023), “Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: the socio-technical system theory perspective”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 454-474, doi: 10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0254