VIJ Digital library
Articles

The Effectiveness of Problem-Posing Learning Model in Terms of Creative Thinking Skills and Math Anxiety

Ayuning Tyas Wulandari
Yogyakarta State University, Department of Mathematics Education, Colombo Road No. 1, Yogyakarta,
Agus Maman Abadi
Yogyakarta State University, Department of Mathematics Education, Colombo Road No. 1, Yogyakarta,
Bio
Ramadian Radite
Yogyakarta State University, Department of Mathematics Education, Colombo Road No. 1, Yogyakarta,

Submission to VIJ 2024-09-26

Keywords

  • creative thinking,
  • math anxiety,
  • quasi-experiment,
  • problem-posing

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of problem-posing in terms of creative thinking ability and math anxiety simultaneously as well as analyze the difference in effectiveness between problem-posing and scientific in terms of creative thinking ability and math anxiety simultaneously. Quantitative research type quasi-experimental with a posttest-only control group design was conducted on grade X students at one of the State Senior High Schools in Wonogiri Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia. The research samples were selected randomly from 11 classes and obtained two classes X1 and X3, each with 36 students. Data on creative thinking were obtained through essay tests, which included fluency, flexibility, and novelty aspects. Math anxiety data were obtained through a Likert-scale questionnaire with psychological, cognitive, affective, and attitude aspects. The study results showed that problem-posing was simultaneously effective in creative thinking and math anxiety. However, there was no difference in effectiveness between problem-posing and scientific in students' creative thinking and math anxiety. Following this result, there are research opportunities regarding analyzing the relationship between the level of math anxiety and creative thinking in solving problems based on higher-order thinking skills.

References

  1. Amalina, I. K., Amirudin, M., & M.T., B. (2018). Students’ creativity: Problem posing in structured situation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012012
  2. Apriliyani, Z., Istihapsari, V., & Istiandaru, A. (2022). Analyzing junior high school students’ creative thinking in mathematics based on self-regulated learning. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v6n1.p58-77
  3. Arem, C. A. (2003). Conquering math anxiety: A self-help workbook (2nd ed.). Brooks/Cole - Thompson Learning.
  4. Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. Taylor and Francis Routledge.
  5. Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
  6. Beilock, S. L., & Maloney, E. A. (2015). Math anxiety: A factor in math achievement not to be ignored. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322156014
  7. Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8
  8. Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.18200/JGEDC.2015214253
  9. Blazer, C. (2011). Strategies for Reducing Math Anxiety. Information Capsule. Research Services, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, 1102, 1–8. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536509
  10. Bonotto, C., & Santo, L. D. (2015). On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving, and creativity in the primary school. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 103–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_5
  11. Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
  12. Cahirati, P. E. P., Makur, A. P., & Fedi, S. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika yang menggunakan pendekatan PMRI. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i2.606
  13. Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 3–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3
  14. Cai, J., & Leikin, R. (2020). Affect in mathematical problem posing: Conceptualization, advances, and future directions for research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10008-x
  15. Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: evidence from the spacing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9426-2
  16. Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9081-0
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (4th ed.). Pearson.
  18. Das, R., & Das, G. C. (2013). Math anxiety: The poor problem solving factor in school mathematics. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(4), 1–5. https://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0413/ijsrp-p16134.pdf
  19. De Maeyer, S., Bergh, H. van den, Rymenans, R., Petegem, P. Van, & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2010). Effectiveness criteria in school effectiveness studies: Further research on the choice for a multivariate model. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.09.001
  20. Dwita, A., & Sugiman. (2020). Improving problem-solving ability through problem-posing model in mathematics. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities, 320–324. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.057
  21. Edi, S., & Rosnawati, R. (2021). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika model discovery learning. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i2.3604
  22. Fetterly, J. M. (2020). Fostering mathematical creativity while impacting beliefs and anxiety in mathematics. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(2), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.202002.07
  23. Finlayson, M. (2014). Addressing math anxiety in the classroom. Improving Schools, 17(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/13654802145214
  24. Furner, J. M., & Gonzalez-DeHass, A. (2011). How do students’ mastery and performance goals relate to math anxiety? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75209
  25. Ghasempour, Z. (2021). The effect of implementing structured and semi-structured activities of mathematical problem posing on performance and reducing students’ mathematical anxiety. Research in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 1–14. http://rme.cfu.ac.ir
  26. Golding, J. (2018). Mathematics education in the spotlight: Its purpose and some implications. London Review of Education, 16(3), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.08
  27. Guo, M., Leung, F. K. S., & Hu, X. (2020). Affective determinants of mathematical problem posing: the case of Chinese Miao students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09972-1
  28. Handayani, U. F., Sa’dijah, C., & Susanto, H. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Peserta didik SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Adopsi ‘PISA. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v4i2.12109
  29. Hartmann, L.-M., Krawitz, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2021). Create your own problem! When given descriptions of real-world situations, do students pose and solve modeling problems? ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53, 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01224-7
  30. Headrick, L., Wiezel, A., Tarr, G., Zhang, X., Cullicott, C. E., Middleton, J. A., & Jansen, A. (2020). Engagement and affect patterns in high school mathematics classrooms that exhibit spontaneous problem posing: An exploratory framework and study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09996-7
  31. Hunt, T. E., & Maloney, E. A. (2022). Appraisals of previous math experiences play an important role in math anxiety. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1515(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14805
  32. Kasirer, A., & Shnitzer-Meirovich, S. (2021). The perception of creativity and creative abilities among general education and special education teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100820
  33. Komarudin, Rinaldi, A., Yulina, R., Suherman, & Puspita, L. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa di indonesia: analisis jalur dengan structural equation model. Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v18i1.57048
  34. Kulsum, S. I., Hidayat, W., Wijaya, T. T., & Kumala, J. (2019). Analysis on high school students’ mathematical creative thinking skills on the topic of sets. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v3i2.128
  35. Landas, E. C., & Alova, C. A. R. (2022). Effect of localized lesson plans to the interest and performance of pupils in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12368
  36. Liljedahl, P., & Cai, J. (2021). Empirical research on problem solving and Problem Posing: a look at the state of the art. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01291-w
  37. Lorensia, M., & Wea, M. Y. (2015). Keefektifan problem posing ditinjau dari kemampuan memecahkan masalah matematis dan kreativitas siswa SD di Kabupaten Manggarai. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio, 7(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.36928/jpkm.v7i1.19
  38. Maloney, E. A., Sattizahn, J. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2014). Anxiety and cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1299
  39. Maryati, I., & Nurkayati. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa sekolah menengah atas dalam materi aljabar. Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v16i2.40007
  40. Mendikbudristek. (2022). Permendikbudristek Nomor 22 Standar Mutu Buku, Standar Proses dan Kaidah Pemerolehan Naskah, serta Standar Proses dan Kaidah Penerbitan Buku. Biro Hukum Kemdikbudristek.
  41. Miranda, P., & Mamede, E. (2022). Appealing to creativity through solving and posing problems in mathematics class. Acta Scientiae. Revista de Ensino de Ciências e Matemática, 24(4), 109–146. http://funes.uniandes.edu.co/31135/
  42. Mishra, S., & Iyer, S. (2015). An exploration of Problem Posing-based activities as an assessment tool and as an instructional strategy. Research and Practice In Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41039-015-0006-0
  43. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hopper, M. (2015). International results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/timss-2015/mathematics/student-achievement/
  44. Munggaran, D. S., Rachmawati, T. K., & Sholihah, W. (2022). Mathematics anxiety in online mathematics learning. Gunung Djati Conference Series, 12, 23–29. https://conferences.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/gdcs/article/view/704
  45. Mutodi, P., & Ngirande, H. (2014). Exploring mathematics anxiety: Mathematics students’ experiences. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n1p283
  46. Nasrullah, A., & Marsigit. (2016). Keefektifan Problem Posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi, metode, dan sikap matematis. Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.11180
  47. Núñez-Peña, Isabel, M., Suárez-Pellicioni, M., & Bono, R. (2013). Effects of math anxiety on student success in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.004
  48. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to Learn (Volume III): Students’ Engagement, Drive and Self-Beliefs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201170-en
  49. Ormrod, J. E., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2017). Educational psychology: Developing learners (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
  50. Öztürk, M., Akkan, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2020). Reading comprehension, Mathematics self-efficacy perception, and Mathematics attitude as correlates of students’ non-routine Mathematics problem-solving skills in Turkey. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1042–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648893
  51. Radišić, J., Videnović, M., & Baucal, A. (2015). Math anxiety—contributing school and individual level factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0224-7
  52. Rafi, I., & Sugiman. (2019). Problem posing ability among prospective mathematics teachers. Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.29976
  53. Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.014
  54. Retnowati, E., & Aqiilah. (2017). Efektivitas strategi pengelompokan berpasangan dalam Pembelajaran matematika model CORE. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v35i1.12628
  55. Ridwan, I. R., Rizaldi, V. P., Susilawati, & Hanif, M. (2023). Pengaruh media tangram berbasis articulate storyline 3 terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif materi bangun datar. Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 18(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v18i1.57692
  56. Rismayana, Dinar, M., & Minggi, I. (2021). Description of students mathematical anxiety based on the students’ mathematics ability. ARRUS Journal of Mathematics and Applied Science, 1(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.35877/mathscience555
  57. Robson, S. (2014). The analysing children’s creative thinking framework: Development of an observation-led approach to identifying and analysing young children’s creative thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3033
  58. Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2014). The effects of problem posing on student mathematical learning: A meta-analysis. International Education Studies, 7(13), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p227
  59. Sadak, M., Incikabi, L., Ulusoy, F., & Pektas, M. (2022). Investigating mathematical creativity through the connection between creative abilities in problem posing and problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101108
  60. Sanders, S. (2016). Critical and creative thinkers in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 6(1), 19–27. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jseem/vol6/iss1/4/
  61. Sangco, A. P., Elpidang, E. M., & Sangco, R. M. R. (2023). Problem posing strategy: Effect on students’ mathematical performance and anxiety. SDSSU Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(1), 1–4. https://smrj.nemsu.edu.ph/index.php/SMRJ/article/view/251
  62. Sepehrianazar, F., & Babaee, A. (2015). Structural equation modeling of relationship between mathematics anxieties with parenting styles: The meditational role of goal orientation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.251
  63. Sharma, S. (2015). Promoting risk taking in mathematics classrooms: The importance of creating a safe learning environment. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1), 290–306.
  64. Sharma, Y. (2014). The effects of strategy and mathematics anxiety on mathematical creativity of school students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/279
  65. Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 29, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
  66. Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S. S., & Kenney, P. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.3.0293
  67. Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2015). Is problem posing a tool for identifying and developing mathematical creativity? In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 141–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_7
  68. Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Pembelajaran matematika berbasis pengajuan masalah dan pemecahan masalah. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  69. Sousa, D. A. (2015). How the brain learns mathematics (2nd ed.). Sage.
  70. Suryanti, Widodo, W., & Budijastuti, W. (2020). Guided discovery problem-posing: An attempt to improve science process skills in elementary school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1336a
  71. Triwibowo, Z., Dwidayati, N. K., & Sugiman, S. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa kelas VII melalui model pembelajaran treffinger dengan pendekatan open-ended. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v6i3.17987
  72. Umi, M. I., Riyadi, R., & Usodo, B. (2015). Analisis proses dan tingkat berpikir kreatif siswa SMP dalam pemecahan masalah bentuk soal cerita materi lingkaran ditinjau dari kecemasan matematika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(6), 613–624. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/s2math/article/view/6480
  73. Utami, M. (2012). Pengembangan kreatifitas anak berbakat. PT Gramedia.
  74. Voica, C., & Singer, F. M. (2012). Problem modification as an indicator of deep understanding. Topic Study Group 3, Activities and Programs for Gifted Students, ICME-12.
  75. Wardani, Y. E., & Suripah. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SMA berdasarkan kemampuan akademik. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 3039–3052. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2338
  76. Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2010). Anxiety 101. Springer Publishing Company.