VIJ Digital library
Articles

Analysis of Utaut Application on Digital Bank Usage in Jabodetabek

Aulianti Hanifah
2Magister of Management, Gunadarma University,
Christina Dewi Wulandari
2Magister of Management, Gunadarma University, Indonesia

Submission to VIJ 2024-07-29

Keywords

  • UTAUT,
  • Digital Banking,
  • Behavioral intentions ,
  • Use Behavior

Abstract

Digital banking is a form of adaptation to new threats and changes in the banking sector. This can be seen from the actions of major banks launching their own digital banks. Such as Digibank, Bank Jago, Jenius and TMRW which were founded by major banks in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of UTAUT variables on digital bank users in Jabodetabek. The analysis method used in this research is PLS-SEM with the SmartPLS 3.3.3 application tool. The data obtained in this study were taken using a questionnaire instrument with Google Form. The stages of analysis carried out in this study are starting from the outer model, inner model, and hypothesis testing. The acquisition of valid data that was successfully collected was 250 respondents. The sampling method in this study is non probability sampling with purposive sampling technique. The results of this study indicate that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence have an influence on behavioral intention and facilitating conditions and behavioral intention also have an influence on use behavior. In this study it was found that only experience can moderate the relationship between facilitating conditions and use behavior.

References

  1. Alkhowaiter, W. A. (2022). Use and behavioural intention of m-payment in GCC countries: Extending meta-UTAUT with trust and Islamic religiosity. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100240
  2. Alshannag, F. M., Makhamreh, H. Z., Ngah, A. H., Eneizan, B., Odeh, M. H., & Alsakarneh, A. (2022). E-payment Acceptance: Extended UTAUT Model with Security Factor. Information Sciences Letters, 11(3), 943–950. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/110325
  3. Anjani, W., & Mukhlis, I. (2022). Penerapan Model UTAUT (The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) Terhadap Minat dan Perilaku Penggunaan Mobile Banking. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.19184/jeam.v21i1.30570
  4. Chaveesuk, S., Khalid, B., Bsoul-Kopowska, M., Rostanska, E., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2022). Comparative analysis of variables that influence behavioral intention to use MOOCs. PLoS ONE, 17(4 April), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262037
  5. Chaveesuk, S., Khalid, B., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2021). Digital payment system innovations: A marketing perspective on intention and actual use in the retail sector. Innovative Marketing, 17(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.09
  6. Cupian, Valentino, U., & Noven, S. A. (2022). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat menggunakan bank digital syariah pada Generasi Z: Studi Kasus di Kota BOgor. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(02), 1679–1688. http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i2.5299
  7. Esawe, A. T. (2022). Understanding mobile e-wallet consumers’ intentions and user behavior. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 26(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-05-2022-0105
  8. Fatimah, S. B., & Hendratmi, A. (2020). Digitalisasi pada bank mandiri syariah di tengah persaingan dan perubahan teknologi. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 7(4), 795. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20204pp795-813
  9. Galazova, S. S., & Magomaeva, L. R. (2019). The transformation of traditional banking activity in digital. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/369
  10. Gunawan, C. F. (2019). Pengaruh performance expectancy dan social influence terhadap behavioral intention di aplikasi hijabenka. Agora, 7(2), 1–6. http://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/manajemen-bisnis/article/view/9111
  11. Gunawan, H., Sinaga, B. L., & Sigit Purnomo, W. P. (2019). Assessment of the readiness of micro, small and medium enterprises in using E-money using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) method. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.129
  12. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
  13. Humaid, A. Bin, & Sabri, Y. (2019). The examination of factors influencing saudi small businesses’ social media adoption, by using utaut model. International Journal of Business Administration, 10(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v10n2p96
  14. Ivanova, A., & Kim, J. Y. (2022). Acceptance and use of mobile banking in Central Asia: Evidence from modified UTAUT Model. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no2.0217
  15. Jung, J. H., Kwon, E., & Kim, D. H. (2020). Mobile payment service usage: U.S. consumers’ motivations and intentions. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1(May), 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100008
  16. Kumala, S. L. (2022). Perkembangan ekonomi berbasis digital di Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Regional Science, 1(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.52421/jurnal-esensi.v1i2.190
  17. Lesmana, R. A., & Ashfath, F. (2022). Analisis pengaruh performance expectancy dan effort expectancy terhadap minat penggunaan aplikasi Jago milik PT. Bank Jago Tbk. Prosiding SNAM PNJ.
  18. Mufingatun, M., Prijanto, B., & Dutt, H. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting adoption of mobile banking application in Indonesia: an application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2). BISMA (Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 12(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v12n2.p88-105
  19. Pamungkas, Z. Y., & Sudiarno, A. (2022). Implementasi model UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan aplikasi Brimo. 9(3), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.202296047
  20. Prastyaningtyas, E. W., Aprilia, N. D., Waluyo, S. D., Saragih, H. J. R., Pertahanan, E., Pertahanan, F. M., Adha, L. H., Asyhadie, Z., Kusuma, R., Wibowo, E. W., Kumala, S. L., & Suryaningtyas, C. D. (2018). Perkembangan ekonomi digital indonesia the Development of Indonesia's Digital Economy. Jurnal Lentera Bisnis, 1(2), 245–259. http://repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/8375
  21. Priadana, S., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (1st ed.). Pascal Books. https://anyflip.com/tzxmy/fzxh/basic/201-229
  22. Purba, M., Samsir, & Arifin, K. (2020). Pengaruh persepsi kemudahan penggunaan, persepsi manfaat dan kepercayaan terhadap kepuasan dan niat menggunakan kembali aplikasi ovo pada mahasiswa pascasarjana Universitas Riau. Jurnal Tepak Manajemen Bisnis, XII(1), 151–170.
  23. Purnomo, G. W. (2019). Pengujian UTAUT model dalam pemanfaatan literasi informasi perpustakaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik ( JIAP ). 5(3), 277–284.
  24. Rachmawati, I. K., Bukhori, M., Majidah, Y., Hidayatullah, S., & Waris, A. (2020). Analysis of use of mobile banking with Acceptance And Use Of Technology (UTAUT). International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research , 9(8), 534–540. www.ijstr.org
  25. Rahman, M., Ismail, I., & Bahri, S. (2020). Analysing consumer adoption of cashless payment in Malaysia. Digital Business, 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100004
  26. Samartha, V., Shenoy Basthikar, S., Hawaldar, I. T., Spulbar, C., Birau, R., & Filip, R. D. (2022). A study on the acceptance of mobile-banking applications in India—Unified Theory of Acceptance and Sustainable Use of Technology Model (UTAUT). Sustainability, 14(21), 14506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114506
  27. Savić, J., & Pešterac, A. (2019). Antecedents of mobile banking: UTAUT model. The European Journal of Applied Economics, 16(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.5937/ejae15-19381
  28. Setiawan, M. H., Komarudin, R., & Kholifah, D. N. (2022). Pengaruh kepercayaan, tampilan dan promosi terhadap keputusan pemilihan aplikasi marketplace. Jurnal Infortech, 4(2), 141. http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/infortech139
  29. Setiawan, W. (2017). Era digital dan tantangannya. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 1–9.
  30. Sriyeni, Y., Antoni, D., & Akbar, M. (2018). Analisis penerimaan dan penggunaan teknologi Computer Based Test (CBT) sebagai media ujian online dengan Model Uified Theory of Acceptance And Use of Technology (UTAUT). Teknomatika, 08(01), 93–104.
  31. Sutanto, S., Ghozali, I., & Handayani, R. S. (2018). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah (SIPKD) dalam perspektif the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT 2) di Kabupaten Semarang. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 15(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.14710/jaa.15.1.37-68
  32. Syahrani, A., & Indah, D. R. (2023). Analisis faktor penerimaan media sosial pemerintah (Studi kasus instagram Dinas Pariwisata Kota Palembang @charming.palembang). 763–774.
  33. Tolba, E. G., & Youssef, N. H. (2022). High school science teachers’ acceptance of using distance education in the light of UTAUT. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12365
  34. Tomić, N., Kalinić, Z., & Todorović, V. (2022). Using the UTAUT model to analyze user intention to accept electronic payment systems in Serbia. Portuguese Economic Journal, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-022-00210-5
  35. Vebiana, V. (2018). Perbankan digital, pengalaman pelanggan, dan kinerja keuangan bank syariah. Prosiding Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, Vol. 9, h.747. https://jurnal.polban.ac.id/ojs-3.1.2/proceeding/article/view/1145, diakses pada 13 Oktober 2022, pukul 11.58 WIB
  36. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  37. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Venkatesh_Thong_Xu_MISQ_forthcoming (Gender Age Experience). MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
  38. Wahyuni, A. T., & Susanto, P. (2022). The role of perceived risk as moderating the relationship between behavioural intentions to E-Money users in Padang city: adoption of the UTAUT model 1. Marketing Management, 2(1), 27–35.
  39. Widiyanti Kurnianingsih, Rahma Widyawati, Mei Maemunah, Istiningsih, Sri Mulyatun, Eny Nurnilawaty, N. N. K. (2022). Shopeepay mobile payment adoption analysis using the utaut model approach (Case study at Amikom University Yogyakarta). Indonesian Journal of Business Intelligence, 5(1), 61–69.
  40. Wijaya, K. (2021). Digital Banking VS Digital Bank. Majalah Info Bank, 1, 1–5.
  41. Yel, M. B., & Ningtyas, S. A. (2019). Implementasi model utaut untuk analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi minat pemanfaatan dan perilaku penggunaan sistem informasi. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 3(2), 25–38.