VIJ Digital library
Articles

Unveiling The Interplay: Board Gender Diversity, Surname Ties, Capital Structure on Firm Performance: The Mediating Role Agency Cost

Nia Yuniarsih
Accounting Study Program, Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika
Budiono
Doctoral Program in Management Science, STIESIA
Nur Fadjrih Asyik
Accounting Study Program, STIESIA

Submission to VIJ 2024-07-28

Keywords

  • board gender diversity,
  • surname ties,
  • firm performance

References

  1. Abdullah, H., & Tursoy, T. (2019). Capital structure and firm performance: evidence of Germany under IFRS adoption. Review of Managerial Science, 15(2), 379–398.
  2. Abdullah, S. N. (2014). The causes of gender diversity in Malaysian large firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(4), 1137–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9279-0
  3. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
  4. Adusei, M., Akomea, S. Y., & Poku, K. (2017). Board and management gender diversity and financial performance of microfinance institutions. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1360030. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1360030
  5. Ain, Q. U., Yuan, X., Javaid, H. M., Usman, M., & Haris, M. (2021). Female directors and agency costs: evidence from Chinese listed firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1604–1633. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2019-0818
  6. Aljifri, K., & Moustafa, M. (2007). The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on the Performance of UAE Firms: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 23(2), 71–93.
  7. Amin, A., Ur Rehman, R., Ali, R., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). Does gender diversity on the board reduce agency cost? Evidence from Pakistan. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 37(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-2020-0303
  8. Ang, J. S., Cole, R., & Lin, J. W. (2007). Agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate Governance and Corporate Finance: A European Perspective, 55(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203940136
  9. Ankamah-Yeboah, I., Nielsen, R., & Llorente, I. (2021). Capital structure and firm performance: Agency theory application to Mediterranean aquaculture firms. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 25(4), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2021.1976884
  10. Brigham, E. F., & Daves, P. R. (2018). Intermediate Financial Management (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
  11. Bank Indonesia, (2019). Promt Manufacturing Index.
  12. Chen, C., & Hassan, A. (2022). Management gender diversity, executives compensation and firm performance. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2021-0109
  13. Combs, J. G., Crook, T. R., & Shook, C. L. (2005). The Dimensionality of Organizational Performance and Its Implications for Strategic Management Research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 2(1), 259–286.
  14. Dao, B. T. T., & Ta, T. D. N. (2020). A meta-analysis: capital structure and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Development, 22(1), 111–129.
  15. Davies, H. (2011). Sharing Surnames: Children, Family and Kinship. American Journal of Sociology, 45(1), 554–569.
  16. Davies, S. G. (2018). Keberagaman Gender di Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  17. Dawar, V. (2014). Agency theory, capital structure and firm performance: some Indian evidence. Managerial Finance, 40(12), 1190–1206. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-10-2013-0275
  18. Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955
  19. Du, X. (2017). What’s in a Surname? The Effect of Auditor-CEO Surname Sharing on Financial Misstatement. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(3), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3762-5
  20. Ellwood, S., & Lacalle, J. G. (2014). The Influence of Presence and Position of Women on the Boards of Directors: The Case of NHS Foundation Trusts. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–16.
  21. Fakih, M. (2013). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial (15th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
  22. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.
  23. Fauver, L., & McDonald, M. B. (2015). Culture, agency costs, and governance: International evidence on capital structure. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 34, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.05.001
  24. Florackis, C. (2008). Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence for UK firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 4(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130810837375
  25. Garanina, T., & Muravyev, A. (2020). The gender composition of corporate boards and firm performance: Evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014120301564
  26. García-Meca, E., & Santana-Martín, D. J. (2022). Board gender diversity and performance in family firms: exploring the faultline of family ties. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00563-3
  27. Gompers, P. A., Mukharlyamov, V., & Xuan, Y. (2016). The cost of friendship. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(3), 626–644.
  28. Gordini, N., & Rancati, E. (2017). Gender diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance. Management Research Review, 40(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2016-0039
  29. Gymrek, M., McGuire, A. L., Golan, D., Halperin, E., & Erlich, Y. (2013). Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference. Science, 339(1), 321–324.
  30. Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis : A Global Perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River (N.J.) : Pearson education. http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:001321386
  31. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
  32. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
  33. Harvey, C. R., Lins, K. V., & Roper, A. H. (2004). The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.07.003
  34. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/259266
  35. Hussain, H. I., Ali, A., Thaker, H. M. T., & Ali, M. (2019). Firm Performance and Family Related Directors: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Market. Contemporary Economics, 13, 187+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A597615935/AONE?u=anon~1f0406e7&sid=googleScholar&xid=2aa8aaff
  36. Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The Effects of Women on Corporate Boards on Firm Value, Financial Performance, and Ethical and Social Compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9
  37. Jabbary, H., Hajiha, Z., & Labeshka, R. H. (2013). Investigation of the effect of agency costs on firm performance of listed firms in Tehran Stock Exchange. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 771–776.
  38. Jadiyappa, N., Jyothi, P., Sireesha, B., & Hickman, L. E. (2019). CEO gender, firm performance and agency costs: evidence from India. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(2), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2017-0238
  39. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm : Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1), 305–360.
  40. Jurkus, A. F., Park, J. C., & Woodard, L. S. (2011). Women in top management and agency costs. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.010
  41. Kennett, D. (2012). The Surnames Handbook: A Guide to Family Name Research in the 21st Century (1st ed.). The History Press.
  42. Khan, H. ur R., Khidmat, W. Bin, Al Hares, O., Muhammad, N., & Saleem, K. (2020). Corporate Governance Quality, Ownership Structure, Agency Costs and Firm Performance. Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal Risk Financial Management, 13(154), 1–33.
  43. Khan, W., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). Ceo gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67(1), 55+66.
  44. Khuong, N. V., Anh, L. H. T., Quyen, P. N., & Thao, N. T. T. (2022). Agency cost: A missing link between female on board and firm performance. Business Strategy & Development, 5(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.199
  45. Kibat, D. A., Bujang, I., & Chu, A. W. S. (2019). Board gender diversity and firm’s performance in Malaysia: Does it matter? The Business and Management Review, 10(3), 168–175.
  46. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical Mass:: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005
  47. Kurniawati, D., & Yatna, C. N. (2020). The Influence of Capital Structure, Company Size, Corporate Governance on Company Performance With Agency Cost as Intervening Variables. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 108(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2020-12.10
  48. Le, T. P. V., & Phan, T. B. N. (2017). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from a small transition country. Research in International Business and Finance, 42(1), 710–726.
  49. Lee, T. (2019). Management ties and firm performance: Influence of family governance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.12.003
  50. Loukil, N., Yousfi, O., & Yerbanga, R. (2019). Does gender diversity on boards influence stock market liquidity? Empirical evidence from the French market. Journal of Business in Society, 19(4), 669–703.
  51. Müller, V.-O. (2014). Do corporate board compensation characteristics influence the financial performance of listed companies? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109(1), 983–988.
  52. Myers, S. C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574–592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x
  53. OECD. (2023). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2023. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/6d912314-en
  54. Pandey, K. D., & Sahu, T. N. (2019). Debt Financing, Agency Cost and Firm Performance: Evidence from India. Vision, 23(3), 267–274.
  55. Peng, Y. (2004). Kinship Networks and Entrepreneurs in China’s Transitional Economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1045–1074.
  56. Rajverma, A. K., Misra, A. K., Mohapatra, S., & Chandra, A. (2019). Impact of ownership structure and dividend on firm performance and firm risk. Managerial Finance, 45(8), 1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2018-0443
  57. Robb, A., & Watson, J. (2002). Comparing the Performance of Male-and Female-Controlled Businesses: Relating Outputs to Inputs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 91–100.
  58. Roberson, Q. M., & Park, H. J. (2007). Examining the Link Between Diversity and Firm Performance: The Effects of Diversity Reputation and Leader Racial Diversity. Group & Organization Management, 32(5), 548–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106291124
  59. Singh, A. K., Singhania, S., & Sardana, V. (2019). Do Women on Boards affect Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from Indian IPO Firms. The Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 3(2), 53–68.
  60. Solimun, Fernandes, A. A. R., & Nurjannah. (2020). Metode Statistika Multivariat Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural (SEM) Pendekatan WarpPLS (5th ed.). UB Press.
  61. Vilasuso, J., & Minkler, A. (2001). Agency costs, asset specificity, and the capital structure of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00151-7
  62. Wang, G. Y. (2010). The Impacts of Free Cash Flows and Agency Costs on Firm Performance. J.Ournal Service Science & Management, 3(1), 408–418.
  63. Wangfeng, Z., & Lihong, C. (2015). Family involvement, internal control and agency costs - — Evidences from China’s listed family firms. Proceedings of the 1st Czech-China Scientific Conference, 1(1), 1–7.
  64. Wellalage, N. H., & Locke, S. (2013). Women on board, Firm Financial Performance and Agency Costs. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s13520-012-0020-x
  65. Wright, P., Kroll, M., Mukherji, A., & Pettus, M. L. (2009). Do the contingencies of external monitoring, ownership incentives, or free cash flow explain opposing firm performance expectations? Journal of Management and Governance, 13(3), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9063-8
  66. Zattoni, A., Gnan, L., & Huse, M. (2015). Does Family Involvement Influence Firm Performance? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Board Processes and Tasks. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1214–1243. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/0149206312463936
  67. Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Jia, M., & Ren, Y. (2017). Do outside directors matter? The impact of prestigious CEOs on firm performance. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-10-2016-0199
  68. Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Jia, M., & Ren, Y. (2020). A tiger with wings: CEO–board surname ties and agency costs. Journal of Business Research, 118, 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.026
  69. Zhang, X., & Dou, J. (2021). Family firms and regional development: Evidence from China. Family Business and Regional Development. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9780429058097-16/family-firms-regional-development-xinrui-zhang-junsheng-dou-hanqing-chevy-fang
  70. Zulvia, Y., & Serly, V. (2019). Capital Structure, Ownership Structure, and Firm Size: It’s Implication on Agency Cost (A Study in Indonesia Manufacturing Company). Proceedings of the 4th Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2019), 2(1), 873–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200305.153