Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

Factors Influencing Academic Performance, With the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing of Students: Evidence from Public Higher Education Institutions in Vietnam

PDF
  • Tran Hai Yen,
  • Nguyen Phuong Linh,
  • Phan Dinh Quyet
Tran Hai Yen
Thuongmai University, Hanoi,
Nguyen Phuong Linh
Thuongmai University, Hanoi,
Phan Dinh Quyet
Thuongmai University, Hanoi,
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 12 No. 07 (2024)

Submission to VIJ 2024-07-28

Keywords

  • Factors influence knowledge sharing, higher education, knowledge, knowledge sharing, students.

Copyright (c) 2024 Tran Hai Yen, Nguyen Phuong Linh, Phan Dinh Quyet

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate Vietnamese students' perceptions in terms of the influence of factors on academic performance through knowledge sharing. A quantitative research approach was used in this study. The Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) approach supported by Smart-PLS 3.0 computer software was used for data analysis. An online questionnaire was distributed to 289 participants, but only 250 qualified. The participants in this study were Vietnamese students who are studying at public universities in Vietnam. This pilot study indicates that all factors, including knowledge self-efficacy; university support, information technology were found to be significant predictors of sharing activities. Furthermore, knowledge sharing has a positive impact on their academic performance. Among this, knowledge self-efficacy has the strongest impact on knowledge sharing, meanwhile, information technology has the least impact on knowledge sharing.

PDF

References

  1. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E. (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107– 136.
  2. Christensen, P. H. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 1-12.
  3. Davenport, T.H., and Prusak, L. (1998). What do we talk about when we talk about knowledge? Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  4. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
  5. Kaewchur, O. and Phusavat, K. (2016), “Key factors influencing knowledge sharing”, International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS), Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 236-237.
  6. Lai, H. and Hsieh, P. (2013), “The decision to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities: the moderating role of knowledge-sharing experience and knowledge self-efficacy”, PACIS, pp. 1-16.
  7. Maddux, J.E. (2016), “Self-efficacy”, in Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Expectancies, Routledge, London, pp. 41-46.
  8. Montano, B. (2005). Innovations of knowledge management. Hershey, PA: IRM Press.
  9. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
  10. Nardi, B.A., Whittaker, S. & Bradner, E. (2000) Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. Proceedings of CSCW’00, 79–88.
  11. Newell, S. & Edelman, L.F. (2008) Developing a dynamic project learning and cross-project learning capability: synthesising two perspectives. Information Systems Journal, 18, 567–591.
  12. Othman, R. and Skaik, H. (2014), “Determinants of academics’ knowledge sharing behavior in United Arab Emirates universities”, Journal of Education and Vocational Research, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-12.
  13. Pathirage, C. P., Amaratunga, D. G., and Haigh, R. P. (2007). Tacit knowledge and organisational performance: Construction industry perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 1-13.
  14. Rhodes, J., Lok, P., Hung, R. Y. Y., & Fang, S. C. (2008). An integrative model of organizational learning and social capital on effective knowledge transfer and perceived organizational performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(4), 245-258.
  15. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836.
  16. Ryu, C.S., Kim, Y.J., Chaudhury, A. & Rao, H.R. (2005) knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing and learning-from-others. MIS Quarterly, 29, 245–278.
  17. Swift, M., Balkin, D. B., & Matusik, S. F. (2010). Goal orientations and the motivation to share knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 378–393.
  18. Tong, J. & Mitra, A. (2009) Chinese cultural influences on knowledge management practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 49–62.
  19. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
  20. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115–131.
  21. Yli‐Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 587-613.