Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

MPIA as Solution of Appellate Body Dilemma: An Overview of the Advantages of New Mechanism of WTO Dispute Settlement

PDF
  • Mohamed Salah Adawi Ahmed,
  • Zhang Junxiang,
  • Basel Khaled Alsaeed,
  • Muhammad Zeeshan Ajmal
Mohamed Salah Adawi Ahmed
PhD Scholar, International Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,
Zhang Junxiang
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome Joint training
Basel Khaled Alsaeed
PhD Scholar, International Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,
Muhammad Zeeshan Ajmal
PhD Scholar, International Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 12 No. 05 (2024)

Submission to VIJ 2024-05-06

Keywords

  • MPIA; WTO; Dispute settlement; Appellate Body

Copyright (c) 2024 Mohamed Salah Adawi Ahmed, Zhang Junxiang, Basel Khaled Alsaeed, Muhammad Zeeshan Ajmal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In December 2019, the WTO Appellate Body, the heart of global trade governance, encountered an unprecedented impasse due to the United States blockade on the appointment of its members. This paper delves into the emergence of the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) as a provisional solution to this deadlock. Established by the European Union and trade partners, and now endorsed by 53 WTO members, the MPIA aims to temporarily fill the void left by the paralyzed Appellate Body by utilizing Article 25 of the DSU. Through a juridical normative methodology complemented by historical and descriptive analysis, this study critically evaluates the MPIA's role within the context of international trade dispute resolution. It compares the MPIA's innovative mechanism against the traditional WTO dispute settlement mechanisms, illuminating both its merits and limitations. The paper argues that while the MPIA represents a creative and necessary stopgap, beyond this, it is not a solution for the challenges facing the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism. The findings emphasize the crucial element for comprehensive reform within the WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM) to regain its functionality and credibility in international trade dispute settlement.

PDF

References

  1. Alan Yanovich, "WTO Issues First Award Under MPIA and Tackles Standard of Review in Anti-Dumping Disputes", January 17, (2023). Available at: https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/blogs/ag-trade-law/wto-issues-first-award-under-mpia-and-tackles-standard-of-review-in-anti-dumping-disputes
  2. Amrita Bahri, “Appellate Body Held Hostage”: Is Judicial Activism at Fair Trial?", Journal of World Trade, (2019).
  3. Arata Kuno, "Japan’s joining MPIA an outside chance to boost momentum for WTO reform”, Asia University, May 14 (2023).
  4. B. Hoekman and C.Sabel, “open plurilateral agreements global Spillovers and the multilateral trading system”, BertelsmannStiftung Working Paper, March 25, (2020).
  5. Baroncini, E, “Preserving the Appellate Stage in the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: The E.U. and the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement", The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, vol 29(1), (2020).
  6. Bartels, Lorand, “Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the WTO”. Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Fifth Biennial Global Conference Working Paper No.18, June 29, (2016).
  7. Bernard Hoekman & Petros C. Mavroidis, "Preventing the Bad from Getting Worse: The End of the World (Trade Organization) As We Know It?", European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme Working Paper No. RSCAS 2020/06 (2020).
  8. Bown, Chad P, “Participation in WTO dispute settlement: complainants, interested parties and free riders”, World Bank Economic Review, (2005).
  9. Bowon Choi, "Three Years of the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement: An Interim Evaluation of Arbitration as a Means to Appeal WTO Panel Reports", August 11 (2023).
  10. David A. Gantz, James E. Rogers. "An Existential Threat to WTO Dispute Settlement: Blocking Appointment of Appellate Body Members by the United States” University of Arizona, Discussion Paper No. 18-26, July (2018).
  11. Elisa Baroncini, "Saving the Right to Appeal at the WTO: The E.U. and the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement", federalism.it July (2020).
  12. Frank Altemöller,”WTO Appellate Body without Legitimacy? The Criticism of the Dispute Settlement System and the Response of the WTO Member States”, Global Trade and Customs Journal, Vol 16, Issue 4 (2021) pp. 139–148.
  13. GAO, Henry S. "Finding a rule-based solution to the appellate body crisis: Looking beyond the multiparty interim appeal arbitration arrangement", Journal of International Economic Law. Vol. 24/3, (2021).
  14. Gao, Henry S., Disruptive Construction or Constructive Destruction? Reflections on the Appellate Body Crisis, March 1, (2019). Chang-fa Lo, and others,” The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform”, (2019), pp. 215-238.
  15. Giorgio Sacerdoti, "The WTO and its Dispute Settlement System in 2021 and the outlook after MC12 in June 2022", Bocconi University, (2022).
  16. Guillaume Van der Loo, G. "Getting the WTO’s dispute settlement and negotiating function back on track: Reform proposals and recent developments". Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper Series, no. 232. (2022).
  17. Guzman, Andrew T. "Determining the Appropriate Standard of Review in WTO Disputes," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol 42, Article 3. (2009).
  18. H. Scholz, "Rebalancing the Rules of the Multilateral Trading System in Favor of the Poor," Annual 2011 Session of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO Geneva, PC-WTO/2011/2(b)-R.2, March 21, 2011.
  19. Jens Lehne& Carl Grossmann Verlag, "Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO Appellate Body by the United States Legally Justified?", Berlin/Bern, (2019).
  20. Jesse Kreier, "The new “Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU", International Economic Law and Policy Blog, March 27 (2020).
  21. John H. Jackson, Robert E. Hudec and Donald Davis, "The Role and Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism", Brookings Institution Press, (2000), pp. 179-236
  22. Kanungo, Anil Kumar, "Experience of Recently Acceded Member Countries to the WTO", September 11, (2012).
  23. Loo,”Getting the WTO dispute settlement and negotiating function back on track: Reform proposals and recent developments".
  24. Magnuson, William J., "WTO Jurisprudence and its Critiques: The Appellate Body's Anti-Constitutional Resistance", Harvard International Law Journal Online, Vol. 51, No. 121, (2010).
  25. Mariana de Andrade, "Procedural innovations in the MPIA: A way to strengthen the WTO dispute settlement mechanism", Aug, (2020).
  26. Marie Van Luchene, The MPIA: A Mere Interim Solution or the Pathway to Fixing the WTO”, Stanford-Vienna TTLF Working Paper No. 90, (2022).
  27. Oesch, Matthias, 'Domestic Law', Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution, International Economic Law Series (Oxford, 2003; online edn, Oxford Academic, March 22 (2012)
  28. Pauwelyn, J, "The WTO's Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA): What's New?", World Trade Review, (2023).
  29. See "Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU”, JOB/ DSB/1/ Add.12. (April 30 2020).
  30. Simon Lester, "Can Interim Appeal Arbitration Preserve the WTO Dispute System?", Free Trade Bulletin Num 77, September 1, (2020).
  31. Van der Loo, G. "Getting the WTO dispute settlement and negotiating function back on track: Reform proposals and recent developments". Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper Series, no. 232. (2022).
  32. Yining Yang, "Crisis and Reform Direction of WTO Appellate Body", Atlantis Press SARL, (2021).
  33. See "Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization", Office of the United States Trade Representative, Feb (2020).
  34. See Colombia – Anti-Dumping Duties on Frozen Fries from Belgium, Germany and The Netherlands, Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU, Award of the Arbitrators, WT/DS591/ARB25, December 21 (2022).
  35. See establishment of Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), Geneva trade platform, March (2020). available at: https://wtoplurilaterals.info/plural_initiative/the-mpia/
  36. See Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA)’ (Geneva Trade Platform, July 31 2020) https://wtoplurilaterals.info/plural_initiative/the-mpia
  37. See the General Council, "Communication from the European Union, China and India", WT/GC/W/753. November 23, (2018).
  38. See the WTO Appellate Body Report, in Chile - Price Band System and Safeguard Measures Relating to Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS207/AB/R. The Appellate Body held in Chile – Price Band such panel acts 'ultra petita'.
  39. See USTR, "Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization", Feb (2020).