VIJ Digital library
Articles

Improving resilience and efficiency in the energy sector: A perspective on cybersecurity and renewable energy storage.

Oluwadamilola Ogunleye
George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
Sulaimon Adeniji
University of Lagos, Lagos State
Valentine Onih
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield,
Yufenyuy Simo
Austin Peay State University, Clarksville
Emmanuel Elom
Austin Peay State University, Clarksville
Emmanuel Kanu
Austin Peay State University, Clarksville
Abdul-Waliyyu Bello
Austin Peay State University, Clarksville
Callistus Obunadike
Austin Peay State University
Nnaji Chukwu
Austin Peay State University, Clarksville
Oluomachi Ejiofor
Austin Peay State University, Clarksville
Juliet Ogutu
Austin Peay State University, Clarksville
Chinenye Obunadike
Anambra State University Uli, Anambra State
Tosin Clement
George Washington University, Washington DC
Somto Kizor-Akaraiwe
George Washington University, Washington DC

Published 2024-05-03

Keywords

  • Cybersecurity, Renewable energy, Energy Sector, Resilience, Energy Sector Efficiency.

Abstract

The study investigates how resilience and efficiency can be improved in the energy sector using cybersecurity. The main objective of the paper is to enable organizations in the energy sector to develop a robust framework to manage renewable  energy storage effectively with little to no cost consequence because of cyberattacks. A survey data saved in the repository of Kaggle was extracted and utilized for the purpose of the study, it contains cybersecurity indicators such as anomaly score, log source, attack types, attacks severity, and response action, which were the features adopted for developing a model, while the target variable was renewable energy generation. A machine learning approach was adopted, with the Rsquared indicating that 61 % variation in renewable energy store is explained by the features included in the model. The study recommends that there should be an increased investment in cybersecurity structure to safeguard energy systems against cyber threats. Also, stakeholders should implement comprehensive training programs to enhance cybersecurity awareness and skills of personnel working in the energy sector.

References

  1. R. IREA, “International Renewable Energy Agency.,” Renewable Capacity Statistics., 2021.
  2. R. IEA, “Cybersecurity and the Energy Sector: Policy Recommendations.,” IEA Publications, 2021.
  3. N. Chukwu et al., “Resilient Chain: AI-Enhanced Supply Chain Security and Efficiency Integration,” Int. J. Sci. Manag. Res., vol. 07, no. 03, pp. 46–65, 2024, doi: 10.37502/IJSMR.2024.7306.
  4. A. Johnson and M. Lee, “Cybersecurity Threats to Energy Infrastructure: A Comprehensive Analysis.,” Energy Policy Rev., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 112–129, 2019.
  5. J. Smith, “Enhancing Resilience in Critical Infrastructure: A Review of Challenges and Strategies.,” J. Energy Secur., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 45–62, 2020.
  6. C. Wang and Y. Zhang, “Advances in Renewable Energy Storage Technologies: A Comprehensive Review.,” Renew. Energy J., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 211–230, 2021.
  7. O. R. I. Eduardo and R. Luis, Brief Overview of Cybersecurity Issues on Smart Power Systems Energy Storage Association. 2015.
  8. C. Scott and M. Brian, “4 top cybersecurity considerations in the renewable energy sector. Retrieved from,” Feb. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cohnreznick.com/insights/4-cybersecurity-considerations-renewable-energy
  9. O. Adekunle et al., “A Review of Cybersecurity as an Effective Tool for Fighting Identity Theft across United States,” Int. J. Cybern. Inform., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 31–42, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.5121/ijci.2023.120504.
  10. T. P. McAllister and C. E. Irvine, “Cyber resilience for critical infrastructure systems.,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 915–924, 2016.
  11. B. Schneier, Data and Goliath: the hidden battles to collect your data and control your world, First published as a Norton paperback 2016. New York London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016.
  12. M. E. Whitman and H. J. Mattord, Principles of information security, Seventh edition. Boston, MA: Cengage, 2022.
  13. S. K. Ransbotham and P. K. Prentice, “Beyond Cybersecurity: Protecting Your Digital Business.,” MIT Slogan Manag. Rev., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 20–23, 2015.
  14. R. USEIA, “U.S. Energy Information Administration: Electricity Data Browser - Electricity in the United States.,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/
  15. Lazard, “Lazard’s levelized cost of storage analysis—version 6.0.” [Online]. Available: https://www.lazard.com/perspective/lcoe2020
  16. R. USDE, “U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). Concentrating Solar Power Projects.,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/concentrating-solar-power-projects
  17. R. AWEA, “American Wind Energy Association. Reports.,” U.S. Wind Industry Market, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.awea.org/wind-industry-market-reports
  18. R. USBR, “U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Hoover Dam.,” Renewable Capacity Statistics. [Online]. Available: https://www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/
  19. R. USDE, “U.S. Department of Energy: Energy storage grand challenge roadmap.,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/12/f81/ESC-Roadmap_December2020.pdf
  20. E. Gregor and O. Jack, Cybersecurity of critical energy infrastructure. European Parliamentary Research Service. 2019.
  21. M. Negreiro, “ENISA and a new cybersecurity act, EPRS.” [Online]. Available: https://www.lazard.com/perspective/lcoe2020