Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

Organisational Learning: A Resource-Based View Analysis

PDF
  • Isaac Onyeyirichukwu Chukwuma,
  • Patrick Chukwunwike Chukwuma,
  • Ifeanyi Leo Madu
Isaac Onyeyirichukwu Chukwuma
University of Port Harcourt
Patrick Chukwunwike Chukwuma
University of Illinois
Ifeanyi Leo Madu
Gregory University
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 12 No. 04 (2024)

Published 2024-04-09

Keywords

  • organisational learning, sustainable competitive advantage, resource-based view

Copyright (c) 2024 Isaac Onyeyirichukwu Chukwuma, Patrick Chukwunwike Chukwuma, Ifeanyi Leo Madu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study theoretically analyzed the relationship between organisational learning (OL) and resource-based view (RBV) in line with examining the concept of OL, concept of RBV, nexus between OL and RBV, response between OL and RBV, calibrating the challenges in synergizing OL and RBV and exploring the competitive advantage in optimizing OL to feature non-substitutable, rare, inimitable, and valuable (NRIV) attributes of RBV. The methodology engaged was the narrative literature review which is validated by its potency to align numerous authors’ perspectives for correlation and explanation. The paper is of the position that OL and its components when optimally refined and optimized are capable of attaining NRIV status and can position an organization at the leading cadre in its industry. The review explored and uncovers relevant literature, and made postulations in comprehending and validating the dynamic relationship in the interplay between OL and RBV.

PDF

References

  1. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-46.
  2. Andrews, K. R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
  3. Armstrong, C. E., & Shimizu, K. (2007). A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 33, 959-986.
  4. Bahlmann, T. (1990). The learning organization in a turbulent environment. Human Systems Management, 9(4), 249-256.
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  6. Barney, J. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, NJ.
  7. Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11, 656-665.
  8. Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-base “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56.
  9. Basten, D., & Haamann, T. (2018). Approaches for organizational learning: A literature review. Sage Open, 1-20.
  10. Bromiley, P. & Fleming, L. (2002). The resource based view of strategy: An evolutionist’s critique. In Augier, M., & March, J. (eds) Economics of choice, change, and organizations: Essays in memory of Richard M. Cyert. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  11. Bromiley, P., & Papenhausen, C. (2003). Assumptions of rationality and equilibrium in strategy research: The limits of traditional economic analysis. Strategic Organization, 1(4), 413-437.
  12. Chiva, R., Ghauri, P., & Alegre, J. (2014). Organizational learning, innovation and internationalization: A complex system model. British Journal of Management, 25, 687-705.
  13. Crook, T., Ketchen, D., Combs, J., & Todd, S. (2008). Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1141-1154.
  14. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.
  15. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  16. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1513.
  17. Drucker, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 45-53.
  18. Dutta, D. K., & Crossan, M. M. (2005). The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: Understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 29(4), 425-449.
  19. Garvin, D. (1993). Building a learning organisation. Harvard Business Review, 71, 78-91.
  20. Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86, 109-116.
  21. Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. B. (2002). The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 725-760.
  22. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
  23. Kozlenkova, I. V., Samaha, S. A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2013). Resource-based theory in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-21.
  24. Law, K. M. Y., & Gunasekaran, A. (2009). Dynamic organizational learning: A conceptual framework. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(6), 314-320.
  25. Leiblein, M. J. (2003). The choice of organizational governance form and performance: Predictions from transaction cost, resource-based and real options theories. Journal of Management, 29, 937-961.
  26. Lockett, A., Thompson, S., & Morgenstern, U. (2009). The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 9-28.
  27. Loermans, J. (2002). Synergizing the learning organization and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 285-294.
  28. Mahoney, J. T. (2001). A resource-based theory of sustainable rents. Journal of Management, 27(6), 651-660.
  29. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. New York: Oxford University Press.
  30. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
  31. Powell, T. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15-37.
  32. Priem, R., & Butler, J. (2001). Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 57-66.
  33. Real, J. C., Roldán, J. L., & Leal, A. (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: Analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25, 186-208.
  34. Richard, O. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 164-179.
  35. Richard, O. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 164-179.
  36. Saarenketo, S., Puumalainen, K., Kuivalainen, O., & Kyleaheiko, K. (2009). A knowledge-based view of growth in new ventures. European Business Review, 21(6), 531-546.
  37. Schneider, K., von-Hunnius, J. P., & Basili, V. (2002). Experience in implementing a learning software organization. IEEE Software, 19(3), 46-49.
  38. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of organizational learning. New York.
  39. Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Random House Digital, Inc.
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  41. Smith, K. A., Vasudevan, S. P., & Tanniru, M. R. (1996). Organizational learning and resource-based theory: An integrative model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(6), 41-53.
  42. Szulanski, G. (1995). Unpacking stickiness: An empirical investigation of the barriers to transfer best practice inside the firm. Academy of Management Journal, Special, 437-441.
  43. Taylor, G. S., Templeton, G. F., & Baker, L. T. (2010). Factors influencing the success of organizational learning implementation: A policy facet perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 353-364.
  44. Templeton, G. F., Lewis, B. R., & Snyder, C. A. (2002). Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 175-218.
  45. Templeton, G., & Snyder, C. (1999). A model of organizational learning based on control. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5-8), 705-719.
  46. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.
  47. Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systematic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  48. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158-177.
  49. Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  50. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
  51. Wu, I. L., & Chen, J. L. (2014). Knowledge management driven firm performance: The roles of business process capabilities and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 1141-1164.
  52. Yang, J. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 83-90.