Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

Ethical Considerations in AI-Powered Work Environments: A Literature Review and Theoretical Framework for Ensuring Human Dignity and Fairness

PDF
  • David Oyekunle,
  • David Boohene,
  • David Preston
David Oyekunle
Faculty of business; Project management Departments. Salford Business School. University of Salford.
Bio
David Boohene
University of Salford, Salford Business School
David Preston
University of Energy and Natural Resources, Ghana
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 12 No. 03 (2024)

Published 2024-03-21

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence, Ethical Considerations, Human Dignity, Fairness, Work Environments

Copyright (c) 2024 David Oyekunle, David Boohene, David Preston

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article critically examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into work environments, focusing on the ethical implications that arise. It seeks to underscore the need for balancing technological advancements with the protection of human dignity and fairness, exploring how AI's transformative potential can be harmonized with the core tenets of human rights.

The article utilizes a comprehensive literature review to construct a theoretical framework that outlines AI's capabilities and ethical considerations. This framework encompasses the interdisciplinary foundations of AI, including its roots in cognitive psychology, decision theory, and computer engineering. It further delves into the ethical dilemmas presented by AI in the workplace, such as privacy concerns, the risk of bias, issues of accountability, and the broader impact on human rights. This exploration is aimed at understanding the complexities of AI's integration into the labor market and its implications for occupational safety and health.

The findings of the article highlight the dual nature of AI as both a catalyst for efficiency and innovation and a source of ethical challenge. It's important to include a lot of different points of view and include everyone in the process of developing AI to make it more fair and respect human rights. Laws and policies need to keep changing to keep up with AI's progress and protect people legally from possible abuses. Strong moral guidelines and clear AI systems are also needed to protect privacy and reduce bias.

The study's originality and value emphasize the need for AI ethical discussions in human rights contexts, contribute to technology governance and human rights discussions, and discuss theoretical debates on human dignity, fairness, and privacy in the face of technological advancement.

PDF

References

  1. Abdallah, S., Sharifa, M., Almadhoun, M. K. I. K., Khawar Sr, M. M., Shaikh, U., Balabel, K. M., ... & Oyelaja, O. T. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Optimizing Diagnosis and Treatment Plans for Rare Genetic Disorders. Cureus, 15(10).
  2. Adamu, A. (2023). The Universality of Human Rights: Myth or Reality?. Journal of Intellectual Property and Human Rights, 2(11).
  3. Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K., & Hamouda, A. (2023). A roadmap for integrating automation with process optimization for AI-powered digital transformation.
  4. Anagnostou, M., Karvounidou, O., Katritzidaki, C., Kechagia, C., Melidou, K., Mpeza, E., ... & Peristeras, V. (2022). Characteristics and challenges in the industries towards responsible AI: a systematic literature review. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(3), 37.
  5. Anand, A. (2023). Exploring the Applications and Limitations of Large Language Models: A Focus on ChatGPT in Virtual NPC Interactions (Master's thesis, Drexel University).
  6. Baker, H. A. E. Integration of Emerging Educational Technologies by Teachers of Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in New Zealand.
  7. Baumgartner, R., Arora, P., Bath, C., Burljaev, D., Ciereszko, K., Custers, B., ... & Williams, R. (2023). Fair and equitable AI in biomedical research and healthcare: Social science perspectives. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 144, 102658.
  8. Bell, G. (2021). Talking to AI: An anthropological encounter with artificial intelligence. The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Anthropology. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1, 442-458.
  9. Bor, S., & Koech, N. C. (2023). Balancing Human Rights and the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Border Security in Africa. J. Intell. Prop. & Info. Tech. L., 3, 77.
  10. Chintala, S. (2023). AI-Driven Personalised Treatment Plans: The Future of Precision Medicine. Machine Intelligence Research, 17(02), 9718-9728.
  11. Dagnaw, G. (2020). Artificial intelligence towards future industrial opportunities and challenges.
  12. Dagnaw, Gizealew. "Artificial intelligence towards future industrial opportunities and challenges." (2020).
  13. Doroudi, S. (2023). The intertwined histories of artificial intelligence and education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(4), 885-928.
  14. Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, T. C., Jingwa, K. A., Okoye, O. K., Okah, M. J., ... & Alimi, H. A. (2023). Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review. Medicine, 102(50), e36671.
  15. Fortes, P. R. B., Baquero, P. M., & Amariles, D. R. (2022). Artificial intelligence risks and algorithmic regulation. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(3), 357-372.
  16. Gadwal, A. A. (2020). HUMAN RIGHTS of the Vulnerables. Ashok Yakkaldevi.
  17. Galindo, L., Perset, K., & Sheeka, F. (2021). An overview of national AI strategies and policies.
  18. Gautam, A. (2023). The evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence on risk management and fraud detection in the banking sector. AI, IoT and the Fourth Industrial Revolution Review, 13(11), 9-18.
  19. Gill, K. S. (2021). Ethical dilemmas: Ned Ludd and the ethical machine. AI & society, 36(3), 669-676.
  20. Górriz, J. M., Ramírez, J., Ortíz, A., Martinez-Murcia, F. J., Segovia, F., Suckling, J., ... & Ferrandez, J. M. (2020). Artificial intelligence within the interplay between natural and artificial computation: Advances in data science, trends and applications. Neurocomputing, 410, 237-270.
  21. Grimm, P. W., Grossman, M. R., & Cormack, G. V. (2021). Artificial intelligence as evidence. Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop., 19, 9.
  22. Gupta, K., Mane, P., Rajankar, O. S., Bhowmik, M., Jadhav, R., Yadav, S., ... & Chobe, S. V. (2023). Harnessing AI for strategic decision-making and business performance optimization. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(10s), 893-912.
  23. Haj Ahmad, N., Stigholt, L., & Penzenstadler, B. (2023)Ai Systems’ Negative Social Impacts and Their Potential Factors. Linnea and Penzenstadler, Birgit, Ai Systems’ Negative Social Impacts and Their Potential Factors.
  24. Hanna, A., Larsson, S., Götvall, P. L., & Bengtsson, K. (2022). Deliberative safety for industrial intelligent human–robot collaboration: Regulatory challenges and solutions for taking the next step towards industry 4.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 78, 102386.
  25. Hemachandran, K., Rodriguez, R. V., Subramaniam, U., & Balas, V. E. (Eds.). (2023). Artificial intelligence and knowledge processing: Improved decision-making and prediction. CRC Press.
  26. Howard, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. American journal of industrial medicine, 62(11), 917-926.
  27. Iniesta, R. (2023). The human role to guarantee an ethical AI in healthcare: a five-facts approach. AI and Ethics, 1-13.
  28. Khan, W. Z., Rehman, M. H., Zangoti, H. M., Afzal, M. K., Armi, N., & Salah, K. (2020). Industrial internet of things: Recent advances, enabling technologies and open challenges. Computers & electrical engineering, 81, 106522.
  29. Kiseleva, A., & Quinn, P. (2021). Are You AI's Favourite? EU Legal Implications of Biased AI Systems in Clinical Genetics and Genomics. EPLR, 5, 155.
  30. Konda, S. R. (2022). Ethical Considerations in the Development and Deployment of AI-Driven Software Systems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 6(3), 86-101.
  31. Kui, S. (2021). The Stumbling Balance between Public Health and Privacy amid the Pandemic in China. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 9(1), 25-50.
  32. Langley, C., Cirstea, B. I., Cuzzolin, F., & Sahakian, B. J. (2022). Theory of mind and preference learning at the interface of cognitive science, neuroscience, and AI: A review. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 5, 62.
  33. Leslie, D., Burr, C., Aitken, M., Cowls, J., Katell, M., & Briggs, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law: a primer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.04147.
  34. Lindgren, S. (2023). Critical theory of AI. John Wiley & Sons.
  35. Machill, S. A. (2020). Biased artificial intelligence-algorithmic fairness and human perception on biased AI (Doctoral dissertation).
  36. Marengo, A. (2023). The Future of AI in IoT: Emerging Trends in Intelligent Data Analysis and Privacy Protection.
  37. Marime-Ball, P., & Shaber, R. (2022). The XX Edge: Unlocking Higher Returns and Lower Risk. Simon and Schuster.
  38. Marques, T. J. F. (2021). Overcoming algorithmic bias: the role of bias awareness, knowledge, and minority status on human decision-making (Doctoral dissertation).
  39. Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., Lundström, J. E., & Popovič, A. (2022). Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’of AI. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 257-268.
  40. Mosissa, G. A. (2020). A re-examination of economic, social and cultural rights in a political society in the light of the principle of human dignity.
  41. Nagy, N. (2023). “Humanity's new frontier”: Human rights implications of artificial intelligence and new technologies. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies.
  42. Nassar, A., & Kamal, M. (2021). Ethical dilemmas in AI-powered decision-making: a deep dive into big data-driven ethical considerations. International Journal of Responsible Artificial Intelligence, 11(8), 1-11.
  43. Nissim, G., & Simon, T. (2021). The future of labor unions in the age of automation and at the dawn of AI. Technology in Society, 67, 101732.
  44. Patel, K. (2024). Ethical reflections on data-centric AI: balancing benefits and risks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, 2(1), 1-17.
  45. Patel, K. (2024). Ethical reflections on data-centric AI: balancing benefits and risks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, 2(1), 1-17.
  46. Penn, J. (2021). Inventing intelligence: on the history of complex information processing and artificial intelligence in the United States in the mid-twentieth century (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge).
  47. Sarker, I. H. (2022). Ai-based modeling: Techniques, applications and research issues towards automation, intelligent and smart systems. SN Computer Science, 3(2), 158.
  48. Segate, R. V., & Daly, A. (2023). Encoding the Enforcement of Safety Standards into Smart Robots to Harness Their Computing Sophistication and Collaborative Potential: A Legal Risk Assessment for European Union Policymakers. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1-40.
  49. Selwyn, N., Andrejevic, M., JD Smith, G., Gu, X., & O'Neill, C. (2020).Facial recognition technology: key issues and emerging concerns
  50. Shade, L. R. (2023). From Media Reform to Data Justice: Situating Women's Rights as Human Rights. The Handbook of Gender, Communication, and Women's Human Rights, 71-87.
  51. Shah, I. A., & Mishra, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in advancing occupational health and safety: an encapsulation of developments. Journal of Occupational Health, 66(1), uiad017.
  52. Shukla, S., George, J. P., Tiwari, K., & Kureethara, J. V. (2022). Data Ethics and Challenges. Springer.
  53. Sibilla, B. (2020). Life and the right to life as the basic constitutional right of a person.
  54. Tschider, C. A. (2020). Beyond the" Black Box". Denv. L. Rev., 98, 683.
  55. Tzimas, D., & Demetriadis, S. (2021). Ethical issues in learning analytics: a review of the field. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1101-1133.
  56. Wasel, S. G. (2022). The United Nations Human Rights System. L'Egypte Contemporaine, 113(548), 491-547.
  57. Whitsel, L. P., Ajenikoko, F., Chase, P. J., Johnson, J., McSwain, B., Phelps, M., ... & Faghy, M. A. (2023). Public policy for healthy living: How COVID-19 has changed the landscape. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases.
  58. Williams, D. P. (2022). Belief, Values, Bias, and Agency: Development of and Entanglement with Artificial Intelligence (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).
  59. Wu, X., Duan, R., & Ni, J. (2023). Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of chatgpt. Journal of Information and Intelligence.
  60. Wu, X., Duan, R., & Ni, J. (2023). Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of chatgpt. Journal of Information and Intelligence.
  61. Zakaria, S., Manaf, S. M. A., Amron, M. T., & Suffian, M. T. M. (2023). Has the world of finance changed? A review of the influence of artificial intelligence on financial management studies. Information Management and Business Review, 15(4 (SI) I), 420-432.