Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

Crafting a Strong Research Design: A Step-by-Step Journey in Academic Writing

PDF
  • Arthur William Fodouop Kouam
Arthur William Fodouop Kouam
School of Management, Hebei University ZIP Code 071000, Baoding City, Hebei Province, China
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 12 No. 03 (2024)

Submission to VIJ 2024-03-03

Keywords

  • Academic writing,
  • data collection instruments,
  • data analysis techniques,
  • research design,
  • robust methodology,
  • sampling strategies,
  • validity and reliability
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2024 Arthur William Fodouop Kouam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive guide for researchers aiming to formulate a robust research design in academic writing. By addressing the definition, significance, and components of research design, this study aims to bridge the knowledge gap and equip researchers with the necessary tools to enhance the quality and reliability of their research. The originality of this study lies in its holistic approach, offering a step-by-step journey that covers various research methods and their suitability for different contexts, as well as crucial components of research design such as sampling strategies, data collection instruments, and data analysis techniques. By enhancing researchers' understanding of research design, this study aims to empower them to produce high-quality research and make meaningful contributions to their fields of study.

PDF

References

  1. Abbott, J. (2014). Research method. Drivers of Illicit Financial Flows.
  2. Abuhamda, E.A., Ismail, I.A., & Bsharat, T.R. (2021). Understanding Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods: A Theoretical Perspective for Young Researchers.
  3. Abutabenjeh, S., & Jaradat, R.M. (2018). Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology. Teaching Public Administration, 36, 237 - 258.
  4. Adebiyi, J.A., & Abayomi, T.O. (2016). Research Design: A Review of Features and Emerging Developments. European Journal of Business and Management, 8, 113-118.
  5. Akhtar, D. (2016). Research Design.
  6. Alderman, A.K., & Salem, B. (2010). Survey Research. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126, 1381-1389.
  7. Alem, D.D. (2020). An Overview of Data Analysis and Interpretations in Research.
  8. Arabian, Z. (2014). THE ROLE OF RESEARCH DESIGN IN A PURPOSE DRIVEN ENQUIRY.
  9. Asenahabi, B.M. (2019). Design: A Guide to selecting appropriate research design.
  10. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The Role of Design in Research: The Integrative Learning Design Framework. Educational Researcher, 32, 21 - 24.
  11. Baskerville, R.L. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Action Research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 2, 19.
  12. Camic, P.M., Rhodes, J.E., & Yardley, L. (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.
  13. Candlin, C.N., Crompton, P., & Hatim, B.A. (2015). Academic Writing Step by Step: A Research-based Approach.
  14. Damato, B.E. (2013). Introduction to study design. Acta Ophthalmologica, 91, 0-0.
  15. Deslauriers, J. (2001). [Elements of research design planning]. Recherche en soins infirmiers, 64, 28-35.
  16. Dongre, A.R., Deshmukh, P.R., Kalaiselvan, G., & Upadhyaya, S. (2010). Application of Qualitative Methods in Health Research: An Overview. Online Journal of Health & Allied Sciences, 8.
  17. Fink, A. (2010). Survey Research Methods.
  18. Godin, D., & Zahedi, M. (2014). Aspects of Research through Design: A Literature Review.
  19. Gschwend, T., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2007). Introduction: Designing Research in Political Science — A Dialogue between Theory and Data.
  20. Hai-fei, L. (2009). The Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods in Social Science Field. Journal of Ningbo Polytechnic.
  21. Harwell, M.R. (2011). Research Design in Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods.
  22. Huxham, C. (2003). Action research as a methodology for theory development. Policy and Politics, 31, 239-248.
  23. Indu, P.V., & Vidhukumar, K. (2020). Research designs-an overview.
  24. Isaacs, A.N. (2014). An overview of qualitative research methodology for public health researchers. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 4, 318-323.
  25. Jang, R. (1980). General purpose of research designs. American journal of hospital pharmacy, 37 3, 398-403.
  26. Kampling, H., Klesel, M., & Niehaves, B. (2016). On Experiments in Design Science Research and Theory Development: A Literature Review. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 4454-4463.
  27. Keppel, G., & Zedeck, S. (1990). Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches.
  28. Keskin, H.A., & Yilmaz, M.L. (2020). REVIEW OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS AND METHODS IN ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION RESEARCH. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi.
  29. Khan, M.N., & Adil, M.S. (2013). Data analysis techniques in service quality literature: Essentials and advances. Serbian Journal of Management, 8, 95-112.
  30. Kozinetz, C.A. (1992). From research question to analysis: the importance of data collection form design. Family practice research journal, 12 1, 17-25.
  31. Kuenen, C., & Redström, J. (2013). The wickedness of design research practices: Methodological issues in bringing knowledge to expression through design.
  32. M-zaidah (2007). Case study as a research method.
  33. Makbul, M. (2021). DATA COLLECTION METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS RESEARCH.
  34. Marshall, T., & Newton, S. (2013). Scholarly design as a paradigm for practice-based research.
  35. McLaren, T.S., & Buijs, P. (2011). A DESIGN SCIENCE APPROACH FOR DEVELOPING INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS.
  36. Omona, J. (2013). Sampling in Qualitative Research: Improving the Quality of Research Outcomes in Higher Education. Makerere Journal of Higher Education, 4, 169-185.
  37. Orluwene, G.W., & Ajala, I. (2020). Determining Research Design and Data Analysis.
  38. Roy, S. (2021). Research Design for Project Writing: Various Outlooks.
  39. Ryals, L.J., & Wilson, H. (2005). Experimental Methods in Market Research: From Information to Insight. International Journal of Market Research, 47, 345 - 364.
  40. Salkind, N.J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design.
  41. Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2011). Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes.
  42. Senam, N., & Akpan, U.U. (2014). THE SURVEY COMMUNICATION RESEARCH.
  43. Setia, M.S. (2016). Methodology Series Module 5: Sampling Strategies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61, 505 - 509.
  44. Sørensen, F., Mattsson, J., & Sundbo, J. (2010). Experimental methods in innovation research. Research Policy, 39, 313-322.
  45. Souza, E.S., Rocha, B.D., Batista, E.D., Oliveira, R.F., Farre, L., & Bittencourt, A. (2014). Revista6Vol89ingles_Layout 1.
  46. Soy, S.K. (2015). The Case Study as a Research Method.
  47. Teeroovengadum, V., & Nunkoo, R. (2018). Sampling design in tourism and hospitality research.
  48. Turner, D.P. (2020). Sampling Methods in Research Design. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 60.
  49. Vallenga, D., Grypdonck, M.H., Hoogwerf, L., & Tan, F.I. (2009). Action research: what, why and how? Acta neurologica Belgica, 109 2, 81-90.
  50. Van Haselen, R. (2004). The Importance of Considering Research Design in a Wider Context. Complementary Medicine Research, 11, 53 - 55.
  51. Walker, C.L. (1987). Qualitative Research Methodology. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 4, 51 - 55.
  52. Webb, C. (1989). Action research: philosophy, methods and personal experiences. Journal of advanced nursing, 14 5, 403-10.
  53. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case Study As a Research Method.