Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

Relationship between Socio-economic Factors and Electrical Energy Consumption of Customer Groups in Indonesia

PDF
  • Muhammad Saleh Mire,
  • Rachmad Budi Suharto
Muhammad Saleh Mire
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Rachmad Budi Suharto
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University.
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 12 No. 02 (2024)

Published 2024-02-24

Keywords

  • GDP per capita, Electrical energy consumption, Customer Group, MSMEs, Poverty, Education

Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Saleh Mire, Rachmad Budi Suharto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The research aim was to study Socio-Economic Analysis and its Relationship with Electrical Energy Consumption of Customer Groups in Indonesia using secondary data from 2018-2022 covering 34 provinces in Indonesia. Data sources generally come from Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) and State Electricity Company (PLN) Indonesia.

The results of the analysis show that GDP per capita, education and MSMEs have a significant negative influence on poverty in Indonesia. Furthermore, GDP per capita is the only variable that has a significant positive effect on electricity consumption, while education, MSMEs and poverty have no effect on residential electricity consumption.

In the industry group, all variables have a significant effect on household consumption, except for education which has an insignificant effect, GDP per capita and MSMEs have a significant positive effect on electricity consumption, apart from that, education and poverty also have an effect but are not significant in the Business group. The research results also show that poverty does not have a significant impact, but GDP per capita, education and MSMEs have a significant positive influence on social electricity consumption. Furthermore, in the Government Office Buildings (GOB) group, GDP per capita and MSMEs have a significant positive effect, however, education and poverty do not have an influence on electricity consumption in this group. Finally, in the Public Street Lighting  (PSL) group, GDP per capita, MSMEs and poverty have no effect, but MSMEs have an influence on electricity consumption.

PDF

References

  1. Rosadi, Mutia and Anwar B., Syamsul. 2019. Factors that Influence Electricity Consumption in Indonesia. Journal of Economic and Development Studies, Volume 1, Number 2, May 2019, Pages 273 – 286
  2. Iniwasikima, D, P, & Ufot, C, U (2013) “The determinants of electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa” Department of Economics, University of Ibadan,Vol 2, Issue 4[2
  3. State Electricity Company. 2015. Electricity Supply Business Plan 2015-2024. PT PLN. Jakarta
  4. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, 2023. Handbook Of Energy & Economic Statistics Of Indonesia (HEESI). Jakarta
  5. Presidential Instruction No. 13, 2011 and Government Regulation (PP) number 70 of 2009, Jakarta.
  6. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, 2021. Handbook Of Energy & Economic Statistics Of Indonesia (HEESI). Jakarta
  7. Miller, R. E. and Blair, P. D. 2009. Input-Output Analysis : Foundations and Extensions. Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved. London.
  8. Han, Sang-Yong (2004)“The Role of The Four Electric Power Sectors in The Korean National Economic” Energy Police, 136-701.
  9. Branson, William H. 1992. Macroeconomics Theory and Policy. Hopper & Row Publishers, Singapore.
  10. Bappenas. 2020. The National Medium Term Development Plan For 2020-2024. Jakarta.
  11. Wijono, Wiloejo Wirjo. 2005. Empowering Microfinance Institutions as One of the Pillars of the National Financial System: Concrete Efforts to Break the Chain of Poverty. Economic and Financial Studies. Special Edition November 2005 pp. 86-100
  12. Andriani, Fenny et all. 2021. The Policy of Cooperative and Small and Medium Enterprises Office inImproving Cooperative Achievement in Lampung Province. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, University of Lampung, under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
  13. Latifi et al.. 2012. The Role of Micro And Medium Industries In Rural Sustainable Development: Case Of The Villages Around Sanandaj City. International Journal of Agriculture, 2 (3), 141-148.
  14. Ministry of Education, Culture and Research and Technology, 2023. Actively Participated in the 46th SEAMEO HOM.
  15. Central Statistics Agency, 2023. Statistical Year Book, 2023. ISSN/ISBN : 0126-2912. Nomor Publication Number : 03200.2303. Jakarta
  16. Suhandi, N. et el. 2018. Analysis of the Influence of Population on the Number of Poverty Using the Linear Regression Method in Palembang City. Global Informatics Scientific Journal. DOI:10.36982/jig.v9i2.543
  17. Prasetyo, Diki and Sasana, Hadi. 2020. Causality Analysis of Physical Infrastructure, Social Infrastructure with ASEAN Economic Growth 2008-2017. IESP Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University, dikiprasetyo@students.undip.ac.id
  18. Sisdiknas, 2003. Act of the Republic of Indonesia on National Education System.
  19. Mankiw, Gregory. 2020. Macroeconomics. Worth Published, Harvard University. Ninth Edition. AMacmillan Education Imprint. New York
  20. GGI, 2024. Education and Economic Development: Exploring Their Symbiotic Bond. Gray Group
  21. Sida, 2017. Dimensions of Poverty Sida’s Conceptual Framework. Sitrus Art.no.: Sida 62028en urn:nbn:se:sida-62028en, ISBN: 978-91-586-4259-1
  22. Haughton, Jonathan. Khandkerand Shahidur R. 2009. Handbook on Poverty and Inequality. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank1818 H Street, NW
  23. Weiss, John, 2005. Poverty Targeting in Asia: Experiences from India, Indonesia, the Philippines, People’s Republic of China and Thailand. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo.
  24. Central Bureau of Statistics, 2017. BPS Performance Report, 2016. ISSN/ISBN: 978-602-438-072-4, Publication Number : 02130.1702. Jakarta
  25. Jain, T dan Khanna, O. 2009. Basic Economics, New Delhi: VK Publication
  26. Malkanthie, Asoka. 2015. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS Book. March 2015DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1960.4647
  27. Wan, T. T. H. (2002). Evidence-based health care management: Multivariate modeling approaches (1st ed.). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  28. . Benjamin at al. 2012. Poverty and Income among the Smallholder Farmers in Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology, Volume 37, 2012 - Issue 3.
  29. Yao, Shujie, 1999. Economic growth, income inequality and poverty in china under economic reforms. The Journal of Development Studies Volume 35, 1999 - Issue 6, Pages 104-130
  30. Mire, Muhammad Saleh. 2023. Analysis of Relationship between Socio-Economic Factors and the Level of Poverty Inequality in Indonesia. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), e-ISSN :2378-703X; Volume-07, Issue-11, pp-223-229
  31. Tipayalai, K. and Subchavaroj, C. 2023. Assessing the spatial impact of educational attainment on poverty reduction in Thailand. Taylor & Francis Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2023.2244702
  32. Nursini, 2020. Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and poverty reduction: empirical evidence from Indonesia. Development Studies Research, Volume 7, 2020 - Issue 1.
  33. State Electricity Company Statistics, 2018-2020. PT PLN Corporate Secretariat. Book. Jakarta
  34. Souza L.C.L et al. 2010. Urban heat islands and electrical energy consumption International Journal of Sustainable Energy, Volume 28, 2009 - Issue 1-3
  35. Johan, Stefanus and Ginting, Ari Mulianta, 2022. Determinasi Konsumsi Listrik di Indonesia. Media Ekonomi Vol. 30 No. 1 April 2022 : 106 - 117 ISSN : 2442-9686 (online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/me.v30i1.10662 ISSN : 0853-3970 (print)
  36. Susanti et al. 2023. MSMEs performance and competitive advantage: Evidence from women’s MSMEs in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, Volume 10, 2023 - Issue 2