The Effect of Change Leadership on Adaptive Performance: Meaningful Work as A Mediating Variable
Submission to VIJ 2024-01-02
Keywords
- Adaptive Performance,
- Change leadership,
- Meaningful Work
Copyright (c) 2024 Widarta, Subarjo Subarjo, Zainur Rahman, Sabilla Saberina, Sri Handayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Organizational change is one continuous study to be carried out because organizational change will definitely occur. The role of the leader as the spearhead of the organization needs to be studied because it will impact on the subordinate’s perception and behavior, one of which is so that they have adaptive performance. Of course, to achieve adaptive performance there needs to be a positive perception of own work.
The aims of this research is to examine the effect of change leadership on adaptive performance: testing the mediating role of meaningful work on the influence of change leadership on adaptive performance. This research uses a quantitative approach, with a purposive sampling technique. The data used is primary data through surveys distributed online by a sample size was 350 respondents. The data analysis technique uses the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) test. The research results proven that change leadership has a significant positive effect on adaptive performance. Furthermore, meaningful work mediates the influence of change leadership on adaptive performance.
References
- Adams, G. A., & Webster, J. R. (2022). Relating supervisor interpersonal emotion management- and task-oriented leadership to adaptive performance: a moderated-mediation model incorporating trust and gender. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 41(4), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-07-2021-0174
- Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189 –208
- Cani€els, M.C.J., Semeijn, J.H. and Renders, I.H.M. (2018), “Mind the mindset! The interaction of proactive personality, transformational leadership and growth mindset for engagement at work”, The Career Development International, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 48-66.
- Chalofsky, N. 2003. An Emerging Construct for Meaningful Work. Human Resource Development International, 6 (1), 69-83.
- Chalofsky, N., & Krishna, V. (2009). Meaningfulness, commitment, and engagement:the intersection of a deeper level of intrinsic motivation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422309333147
- Drucker, P. F. (1995). Managing in a time of great change. New York: Truman Talley Books.
- Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Herold, D. M. (2006). The effects of organizational changes on employee commitment: A multi-level investigation. Personnel Psychology, 59, 1–29.
- Geldenhuys, M., Łaba, K., & Venter, C. M. 2014. Meaningful Work, Work Engagement and Organisational Commitment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 40(1), Art. #1098, 10 pages. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip. v40i1.1098.
- Gill, R. (2003). Reading 2_Gill_change leadership. Journal of Change Management, 3, 307–3018.
- Griffin, M.A., Neal, A. and Parker, S.K. (2007), “A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 327-347.
- Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., Liu, Y. (2008). The Effects of Transformational and Change Leadership on Employees’ Commitment to a Change: A Multilevel Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346 –357.
- Hooper, A. and Potter, J. (2000) Intelligent Leadership, London: Random House.
- Huang, J.L., Ryan, A.M., Zabel, K.L. and Palmer, A. (2014), “Personality and adaptive performance at work: a meta-analytic investigation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 99 No. 1, p. 162
- Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Leonard, H. S. (2002, Winter). Merely a pimple on the derrière of an elephant: On becoming players in the world of organizational consulting. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 54(1), 3-12. Retrieved August 21, 2008, doi:10.1037/1061-4087.54.1.3
- Lunenburg, C. F. (2011). 1 Leadership versus Management: A Key Distinction—At Least in Theory. International Journal Of Management, Business, And Administration, 14(1).
- May, D. R., Li, C., Mencl, J., & Huang, C. C. (2014). The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1736-9
- May, D. R., Gilson , R. L., & Harter, L. M. 2004. The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness, Safety and Availability and The Engagement of The Human Spirit at Work’s. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77 (1), 11-37.
- Michaelson, C., Michael, G. P., Grant, A. M., & Dunn, C. P. 2014. Meaningful Work: Connecting Business Ethics and Organization Studies. Journal Business Ethics, 121; 77-90.
- Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
- Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
- Reinhard, T. (2007). A grounded theory investigation of change leadership during turbulent times. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (UMI No. 3272165).
- Shoss, M.K., Jundt, D.K., Kobler, A. and Reynolds, C. (2016), “Doing bad to feel better? An investigation of within-and between-person perceptions of counterproductive work behavior as a coping tactic”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 137 No. 3, pp. 571-587.
- Truss, K., Soane, E., Delbridge, R., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Petrov, G. (2011). Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 232–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.552282