Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

Content analysis of legal protection regulations for money laundering victims in Indonesia

PDF
  • Arif Budiman,
  • Yusri Munaf,
  • Ellydar Chaidir,
  • Surizki Febrianto
Arif Budiman
1Law Doctoral Program, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Yusri Munaf
Department of Government Studies, Riau Islamic University, Pekanbaru Riau 113, Indonesia
Ellydar Chaidir
Professor in International Law Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Surizki Febrianto
Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 11 No. 12 (2023)

Published 2023-12-02

Keywords

  • Regulation,
  • Money Laundering,
  • Content Analysis

Copyright (c) 2023 Arif Budiman, Yusri Munaf, Ellydar Chaidir, Surizki Febrianto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The offense of money laundering is included within the context of corruption. Money laundering persists in evolving via many techniques, often facilitated by advancements in information technology. Consequently, a notable number of persons use these technological advancements to engage in illicit activities, including the washing of illicitly obtained funds. This research aims to analyze the development of regulations regarding the laundering crime and legal protection for victims. This research uses regulatory and statutory documents as the main data. Documents collected include laws and government regulations regarding money laundering crimes and legal protection for victims. This research uses Nvivo 12 Plus software to code documents for presentation to produce numbers in the form of images. This research found that the development of regulations relating to the crime of money laundering continues to develop so that it is no longer possible for there to be a legal vacuum. Furthermore, Indonesia has not only created legal instruments to deal with perpetrators of corruption but also provides legal protection for victims of money laundering crimes. This research only discusses the aspect of statutory documents. Future research needs a more in-depth analysis by comparing regulations and cases of money laundering crimes.

PDF

References

  1. Arief, M. (2006). Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan, Antara Norma dan Realita. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo dan Realita. Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan, Antara Norma Dan Realita. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Dan Realita.
  2. Atmasasmita, R. (1996). Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perspektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionisme. Eresco.
  3. Djanggih, H., Thalib, H., & Ramadhan, A. (2017). The Corruption Investigation In The Regional Police of Riau Islands, Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 4(1).
  4. Dunga, W. A. (2009). Implementasi UU Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban di Kota Gorontalo. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 21(2), 298–309.
  5. Garnasih, Y. (2017). Penegakan hukum anti pencucian uang dan permasalahannya di Indonesia.
  6. Gulo, I. R., Sunarmi, S., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DENGAN PREDICAT CRIME TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN YANG HARTANYA DIRAMPAS UNTUK NEGARA STUDI PUTUSANMAHKAMAHAGUNG NO. 3096 K/PID. SUS/2018. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(3), 346–358.
  7. Halim, P. (2013). Penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan pencucian uang di era globalisasi. Total Media.
  8. Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 479–498.
  9. Irwan, T. (2021). Implementasi Upaya Pemulihan Aset Korban Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Pencucian Uang Dalam Kasus First Travel. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5(4).
  10. KARMEN, A. (2017). Evaluating how the NYPD handles crime victims: Judgments based on statistical performance measures. In The New York City Police Department (pp. 62–85). Routledge.
  11. Liamputtong, P. (2020). Qualitative research methods.
  12. Mustofa, M. (2013). Suap Menyuap dan Mafia Peradilan di Indonesia: Telaah Kriminologis. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(1), 1–5.
  13. Nasution, B. (2013). Pemahaman Rezim Anti Money Laundering di Indonesia, disampaikan pada Diskusi Hukum dengan tema †œMengenal. Mengetahui Untuk Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uangâ€, Yang Diselenggarakan Oleh DPC PERMAHI Medan Pada Tanggal, 5.
  14. O’Neill, M., Booth, S., & Lamb, J. (2018). Using NVivo for literature reviews: The eight step pedagogy (N7+ 1). Qualitative Report, 23(13), 21–39.
  15. Pohan, S. (2018). Perbandingan Lembaga Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia Dan Beberapa Negara Dunia. Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 271–303.
  16. Rahman, M. S. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review.
  17. Reksodiputro, M. (1997). Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.
  18. Rohrohmana, B. (2017). Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yuridika, 32(2), 210–227.
  19. Satjipto, R. (2000). Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
  20. Sulaksono, S., & Novianto, W. T. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Pemulihan Aset Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Tercampur Dengan Aset PelakU. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 7(1), 107–119.
  21. Waluyo, B. (2014). Optimalisasi pemberantasan korupsi di indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 1(2), 162–169.
  22. Wattimena, R. R. A. (2020). Perspektif Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Pemberian Honorarium Advokat. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
  23. Widyastuti, A. R. (2015). Disfungsionalisasi Birokrasi Sebagai Kendala Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 4(3), 683–699.
  24. Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2016). Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS. ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597–617.