Valley International Journal Digital Library

VIJ Digital library
Articles

Preferences for Hybrid Learning of Postgraduate Students

PDF
  • Salmaini Yeli,
  • Hartono,
  • Kasmuri,
  • Syamruddin Nasution
Salmaini Yeli
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Hartono
Universitas of Islamic Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Kasmuri
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Syamruddin Nasution
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Published in : International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) , Vol. 11 No. 11 (2023)

Submission to VIJ 2023-11-28

Keywords

  • preferences, hybrid learning, graduate students, online learning

Copyright (c) 2023 Salmaini Yeli, Hartono, Kasmuri, Syamruddin Nasution

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper aims to describe the preferences of postgraduate students regarding hybrid learning and the factors that influence their preferences for this learning model. This is considered important because postgraduate students are mature individuals and have the right to determine the learning process that suits their needs. Therefore, this research is a quantitative descriptive study. The research sample consisted of 204 postgraduate students from Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University of Riau, including master's and doctoral programs. Sampling was carried out using a quota random sampling technique without distinguishing between study programs. The research instrument used was a closed questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics in the form of tables and diagrams. The results showed that of the total respondents, 8 students (4%) had a very strong preference for hybrid learning, 165 people (81%) had a preference in the good category, 13 people (6%) had a poor preference, 15 people (7%) had an unfavorable preference, and only 3 people (1%) had a very unfavorable preference for hybrid learning. Factors that influence postgraduate students' decisions to choose hybrid learning include the availability of resources for online learning, as well as the provision of complete and varied online learning resources.
PDF

References

  1. Abdelrahman, N., & Irby, B. J. (2016). Hybrid learning: Perspectives of higher education faculty. In Blended Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vol. 4, pp. 1–28). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0783-3.ch001
  2. Akla. (2022). Arabic Learning by Using Hybrid Learning Model in University. 14(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v
  3. Anggrawan, A., Nuraini, C. K., Mayadi, & Satria, C. (2021). Interplay between cognitive styles and gender of two hybrid learning to learning achievements. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(10).
  4. Aristika, A., Darhim, Juandi, D., & Kusnandi. (2021). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in improving of teacher-student relationship in terms of learning motivation. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01288
  5. Chan, E. S. K. (2010). Hybrid learning: Teaching for quality learning at university. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6248 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_42
  6. Charlotta Hilli, R. T. N., & Aaen, J. H. (2019). Designing Hybrid Learning Spaces in Higher Education. Duke Law Journal, 1(1).
  7. Chattaraj, D., & Vijayaraghavan, A. P. (2021). The mobility paradigm in higher education: a phenomenological study on the shift in learning space. In Smart Learning Environments (Vol. 8, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00162-x
  8. Dwijonagoro, S., & Suparno, S. (2019). Pranatacara learning: Modeling, mind mapping, e-learning, or hybrid learning? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.23034
  9. Edi Wiranto, Muhammad Kristiawan, Y. F. (2021). Learning Atmosphere During The Covid-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i2.133
  10. Engel, O., Zimmer, L. M., Lörz, M., & Mayweg-Paus, E. (2023). Digital studying in times of COVID-19: teacher- and student-related aspects of learning success in german higher education. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 20, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00382-w
  11. Hariadi, B., Sunarto, M. J. D., Sudarmaningtyas, P., & Jatmiko, B. (2019). Hybrid learning by using brilian applications as one of the learning alternatives to improve learning outcomes in college. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i10.10150
  12. Hediansah, D., & Surjono, H. (2020). Hybrid Learning Development to Improve Teacher Learning Management. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v3i12019p001
  13. Johnson, E., Morwane, R., Dada, S., Pretorius, G., & Lotriet, M. (2018). Adult Learners’ Perspectives on Their Engagement in a Hybrid Learning Postgraduate Programme. In Journal of Continuing Higher Education (Vol. 66, Issue 2, pp. 88–105). https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1469071
  14. Jusuf, H., Ibrahim, N., & Suparman, A. (2019). Developing a hybrid learning strategy for students’ engagement in object-oriented programming course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9 A). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071610
  15. Li, M. (2022). Learning Behaviors and Cognitive Participation in Online-Offline Hybrid Learning Environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i01.28715
  16. Li, Q., Li, Z., & Han, J. (2021). A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 26, Issue 6, pp. 7635–7655). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1
  17. Liang, J. (2021). Current State of Art Design Education in Colleges and a New Hybrid Learning Mode. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i17.25651
  18. Masalimova, A. R., Ryazanova, E. L., Tararina, L. I., Sokolova, E. G., Ikrennikova, Y. B., Efimushkina, S. V., & Shulga, T. I. (2021). Distance learning hybrid format for university students in post-pandemic perspective: Collaborative technologies aspect. In Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences (Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 389–395). https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5536
  19. Meydanlioglu, A., & Arikan, F. (2014). Effect of Hybrid Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering, 8(5).
  20. Moreno, J., Sánchez, J. D., & Pineda, A. F. (2021). A hybrid approach for composing groups in collaborative learning contexts. Heliyon, 7(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07249
  21. Müller, C., Mildenberger, T., & Steingruber, D. (2023). Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: why are some courses more effective than others? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00379-x
  22. Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
  23. Nashir, M., & Laili, R. N. (2021). Hybrid Learning as an Effective Learning Solution on Intensive English Program in the New Normal Era. In IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature (Vol. 9, Issue 2, p. 220232). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.2253
  24. Nørgård, R. T. (2021). Theorising hybrid lifelong learning - Nørgård - 2021 - British Journal of Educational Technology - Wiley Online Library.
  25. Palomino, M. del C. P. (2016). Percepciones del alumnado de posgrado acerca de la metodología docente y evaluativa. Profesorado, 20(2), 98–119. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v20i2.10410
  26. Pavlidou, I., Dragicevic, N., & Tsui, E. (2021). A multi-dimensional hybrid learning environment for business education: A knowledge dynamics perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073889
  27. Raes, A. (2022). Exploring Student and Teacher Experiences in Hybrid Learning Environments: Does Presence Matter? In Postdigital Science and Education (Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 138–159). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0
  28. Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. In Learning Environments Research (Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 269–290). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
  29. Rahardjanto, A., Husamah, & Fauzi, A. (2019). Hybrid-PjBL: Learning outcomes, creative thinking skills, and learning motivation of preservice teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12212a
  30. Rodríguez, Y. Castro, R. L.-V. (2018). Perception of blended learning in the teaching-learning process by post-graduate students of Dentistry. 19(4).
  31. Sanpanich, N. (2021). Investigating Factors Affecting Students’ Attitudes toward Hybrid Learning. REFLections, 28(2).
  32. Shimkovich, E. D., Makhmutova, G. F., Ivanova, D. A., & Urunova, R. D. (2022). Advantages and Disadvantages of Hybrid Learning for International Students.
  33. Simonova, I., Poulova, P., & Kostolanyova, K. (2017). Flexible hybrid learning: Comparison of two approaches and learning results. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2017.084484
  34. Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
  35. Sukiman, Sri Haningsih, P. R. (2022). The Pattern of Hybrid Learning to Maintain Learning Effectiveness at the Higher Education Level Post-COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1245–1257. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suntonrapot-Damrongpanit/publication/356662582_Effects_of_Mindset_Democratic_Parenting_Teaching_and_School_Environment_on_Global_Citizenship_of_Ninth-grade_Students/links/61a6dda685c5ea51abc0f7b6/Effects-of-Mindset-Dem
  36. Sultana, R., & Palaroan, R. (2023). COVID-19 and Transition to Online Learning: Evidence from a Sino-Foreign University in China. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 28, 1–20.
  37. Syam, H. . B. M. . A. A. . P. A. A. . R. (2019). Hybrid e-learning in Industrial Revolution 4.
  38. Wang, F. L., Fong, J., & Kwan, R. C. (2009). Handbook of research on hybrid learning models: Advanced tools, technologies, and applications. In Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications (pp. 1–571). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-380-7
  39. Xiao, J., Sun-Lin, H. Z., Lin, T. H., Li, M., Pan, Z., & Cheng, H. C. (2020). What makes learners a good fit for hybrid learning? Learning competences as predictors of experience and satisfaction in hybrid learning space. In British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp. 1203–1219). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12949
  40. Zhang, X., & Zhang, B. Z. and F. (2023). Student‑centered case‑based teaching.pdf.